My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10867
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix E -Water Supply
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />is a constructed proj ect in Arizona, taking water out of the stream a <br />short distance below Parl~er Dam, there would be irrigated only 60,000 <br />acres. I think the proj ect can serve some hundred thousand actes of <br />land or possibly more. <br />"We are also assuming under that condhion that there would be <br />the minimum possible amount of water used on the Yuma proj ect under <br />the assumption that the Yuma project canals would be lined. Under <br />that condition we estimate there would return to the stream below Imperial <br />Dam about 806,000 acre-feet of water. That does not include desilUng <br />water. <br />"Senator DOWNEY. That was on the basis of the testimony that <br />there would be only 80,000 acres irrigated down in the lower Gila <br />Valley? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. Yes, sir; and 60,000 on the Indian project. <br />"Senator McFARLAND. Now will you break that down? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. Yes, sir. This is the break-down of the 806,000 <br />acre-feet. . . . <br />"The break-down of the return flow is as follows: From north Gila <br />Valleynnorth Gila Valley is an area which is al present irrigated; it <br />has been irrigated for many years in Arizona and is immediately below <br />the cana l line which has been constructed to serve the Gila proj ect-- <br />"Senator McFARLAND. The return flow from that proJect, as I <br />understand you, cannot be reused? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. By direct diversion. It could be used by pumping <br />into the All-American Canal. <br />"Senator McFARLAND. How much do you estimate from that? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. Twenty thousand acre-feet. From the Yuma projectn <br />understand, this is cutting the diversion to the limit and only letting <br />sufficient water return to take care of the salt balance which I men- <br />tioned a while ago--12 0,000 acre-feet. <br />"-S~l'iaror-NfCFARIAND-;--Tnat iS1J1e area which you describe down <br />there on the mesa? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. No; it is the existing Yuma project. <br />"Senator McFARLAND. Oh, the existing Yuma project? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. Yes, sir. I should make that plain to the committee. <br />There is at present irrigated below Imperial Dam an area of land which <br />comprises some 65,000 acres. Most of the land lies in Arizona. Some <br />of it lies in California. Diversions were made in the Laguna Dam, which <br />is immediately below the Imperial Dam, on the California side. Water <br />was carried to the California lands and then carried to the Arizona lands <br />by means of a siphon under the river. Those lands will now be served <br />through the All-American CanaL which will release water at the so-called <br />Siphon Drop. <br />"Senator McFARLAND. Those are lands which are now being irrigated? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. Yes, sir. <br /> <br />-18- <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.