My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10867
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix E -Water Supply
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"Negotiations wiLh Mexico over a division of the waters of the <br />Colorado River have been carried on intermittently since early in this <br />century. In 1924 the COi1gress passed an aCe authorizing the Presi- <br />dent to designate three special Commissioners to cooperate with <br />representatives of Mexico il. a study regarding the equitable use of <br />the waters of the RlO Grande below Fort QuiLman, Tex. (Public Law <br />118, 68th Cong., 43 Stat. 118). Mexico was unwilling to discuss <br />the Rio Grande unless at the same time the problem of the Colorado <br />River was also discussed. Accordingly, by Joint resolution approved <br />March 3, 1927 (Public Resolution No. 62, 69Th Cong., 44 Stat. 1043), <br />the scope of the investigation provided for by the act of May 13, 1924, <br />was extended so as to include the Colorado River, and the resolution <br />specifically provided that the purpose was to secure information on <br />which to base a treaty with iV,exico relative to the use of the waters <br />of the two rivers. Permission was also granted to make a similar <br />study of the Tijuana River, subject to Mexico's concurrence. . . . <br />"With. respecL to the Colorado River, Mexico demanded <br />an allocation of 3,600,000 acre-feet a year, whereas the offer of <br />the American section was limited to an allocaUon to Mexico of <br />750,000 acre-feet per annum to be delivered according to schedule, <br />and it was suggested that in addition to this amount the American <br />section would be willing to add an additional amount to compensate <br />for losses in the main canal in Mexico. It WClS also pointed out that <br />in addition Mexico would receive certain return, drainage and other <br />excess flows from the UnitGd States. <br />"I think it is important at this time to call attention to the details <br />ofthat offer to Mexico by the former American section of the Commis- <br />sion. It has great signillcance. Seven hundred and fifty thousand <br />acre-feet of water was to be del1vered into laterals of the canals in <br />Mexico ." <br /> <br />Robert L. Lowry, Engineer, American Section, International Boundary Commis- <br /> <br />sion testified in more detail as to the water supply of the Colorado River. On pagG 235 <br /> <br />Mr. Lowry, after restating the various estimates of virgin flow of the Colorado River <br /> <br />at Yuma introduced by Mr. Lawson, explained thG latGst estimate as follows: <br /> <br />"Mr. LOWRY. . <br />"It is significant that thG difference bGtwGen the lowest and highest <br />of these estimates, based on both early and late figures, as averages <br />before and after the drought period of the 1930' s, is only about 3 percent <br />of the total water supply. <br /> <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.