My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10847
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10847
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:57 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8102
Description
Arkansas River Hydrographs
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/1/1985
Author
USGS
Title
Selected Hydrographs and Statistical Analyses Characterizing The Water Resources of the Arkansas River Basin, Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />A statistical test (Kendall Tau) was computed for the April 1 measure- <br />ments at all the stations to identify possible time trends in the snowpack <br />data. The test indicated that only station 6K07, Four Mile Park, had a trend <br />statistically different from zero at the I-percent significance level. There <br />is no information to account for or discount this apparent upward trend <br />(fig. 40). <br /> <br />Correlation analysis was computed between each precipitation station and <br />snow-survey course, using the monthly precipitation and respective first-of- <br />the-month snowpack data. Only a few correlation coefficients were statis- <br />tically different from zero at the I-percent significance level, and none of <br />them was greater than 0.40. Analysis of incremental snowpack (net change dur- <br />ing the month) and monthly precipitation also showed no statistical correla- <br />tion. A correlation analysis between annual precipitation at all stations and <br />April 1 snowpack at all snow-survey courses indicated that only station 3063, <br />Fountain (2NW) (IN) was statistically different from zero at less than the <br />2-percent significance level. Annual precipitation at that station correlated <br />with the April 1 snowpack measurements at 6 different snow-survey courses <br />(6KI7, 6K07, 6K04, 5M1M, 6L04, and 6K03S), with correlation coefficients rang- <br />ing from 0.39 to 0.61. No explanation is available as to why precipitation at <br />this station, and only this station, correlated with snowpack data. <br /> <br />Discharge <br /> <br />Streamflow-gaging stations where discharge data have been collected were <br />selected based on the length of record and geographic location. The <br />46 streamflow-gaging stations chosen are listed in table 6, and 44 stations <br />are shown on plate 1. Stations 07137500 and 07137000 (not shown on plate 1) <br />are located in Kansas but are used in the analyses to represent flow leaving <br />the State of Colorado. The record available since 1920 and the average <br />discharge for each station are shown in table 7. Hydrographs of annual mean <br />discharge for these 46 stations are shown in figures 55-93 (stations 07079500, <br />East Fork Arkansas River near Leadville, and 07081000, Tennessee Creek near <br />Leadville, are added together and plotted with station 07081200, Arkansas <br />River near Leadville, in fig. 55; stations 07099400, Arkansas River above <br />Pueblo, and 07099500, Arkansas River near Pueblo, are both plotted in fig. 68; <br />stations 07108500, St. Charles River near Pueblo, 07108800, St. Charles River <br />near Vineland, 07108900, St. Charles River at Vineland, and 07109000, <br />St. Charles River at mouth near Pueblo, are plotted in fig. 75; and stations <br />07137000, Frontier Ditch near Coolidge, Kans., and 07137500, Arkansas River <br />near Coolidge, Kans., are added together and plotted in fig. 93). There is no <br />substantial flow entering the Arkansas River between the State line and <br />station 07137500. Tables of monthly discharges are presented in the "Supple- <br />mental Information" section at the end of the report. It should be noted that <br />the average discharge reported in table 7 and in the "Supplemental Informa- <br />tion" section may be somewhat different from values published elsewhere. This <br />difference is because all the average discharges presented in this report are <br />averages of monthly mean values and, thus, do not account for variable number <br />of days per month, as do most published annual or period-of-record means, <br />which are usually computed from daily mean values. <br /> <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.