My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10841
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10841
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1993
Author
Hydroshpere
Title
Yampa River Basin Alternatives Feasibility Study - Executive Summary - Draft - January 1993
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />000442 <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />August. A recreation pool of 16,400 af was defined at Stagecoach to be consistent with <br />historical operating criteria. <br /> <br />Although there is not a minimum release requirement below the existing Elkhead Darn, a <br />minimum release of 10 cfs or inflow was defined in this Study for the enlarged reservoir. An <br />existing release requirement below Stagecoach of the minimum of 40 cfs or the reservoir <br />inflow was also represented. This Study defined the Juniper Project contemplated draft <br />(adjusted to consider the drafts of existing reservoirs) as an instream flow right at Juniper <br />. . Canyon. <br /> <br />Water Supply <br /> <br />Several model revisions and sensitivity tests were made which were designed to test the <br />effects of various reservoir operating criteria imposed on the recommended enlargements. The <br />final results of the revised model runs are presented in Tables S-6 through S-8. Table S-5 <br />shows the shortages to demands under the 2015 and 2040 demand conditions with only the <br />development of the 46,500 af Elkhead Reservoir. As shown in Table S-8, with the <br />development of the Stagecoach Reservoir enlargement to 52,000 af, most of the 2040 demand <br />shortages were eliminated. Table S-6 compares the water delivery shortages in these final <br />model runs with those generated in Scenarios 1I1 and IV. As can be seen, the imposition of <br />more specific minimum release and recreation pool operations at Elkhead had relatively little <br />effect on modeled shortages. . <br /> <br />Table 8-6 <br /> <br />Comparison of Delivery shortages Between Initial and Final Model Runs <br />Assuring Phased Enlargement of Reservoirs <br /> <br />Demand Categorv <br /> <br />Scenario 1I1 <br /> <br />Scenario IV <br /> <br />Final Runs <br /> <br />Potential 1989 <br />Maxirimm <br />Average <br /> <br />5841 <br />1955 <br /> <br />n.a. <br /> <br />6595 <br />1368 <br /> <br />Projected 2015 <br />Maximum <br />Average <br /> <br />572 <br />129 <br /> <br />n.a. <br /> <br />572 <br />164 <br /> <br />Projected 2040 <br />Maximum <br />Average <br /> <br />n.a. <br /> <br />5807 <br />180 <br /> <br />4040 <br />139 <br /> <br />Reservoir Water Levels <br /> <br />Figures S-4 and S-5 show modeled reservoir contents over the study ,period for the 2015 <br />and 2040 demand conditions, respectively. Under 2015 demand conditions with only the <br />enlargement of Elkhead Reservoir, Elkhead was drawn down an average of approximately <br />10,000 af each year; this drawdown typically occurred in the month of February. Stagecoach <br />Reservoir was drawn down each year due to hydropower operations in an arnount of <br />approximately 7,000 af. Under 2015 demand conditions the storage in Stagecoach was used <br />infrequently. <br /> <br />S-21 <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />'!. ;-." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.