Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />000431 <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />Site Selection Recommendations <br /> <br />Based on these evaluations, the multi-disciplinary evaluation team developed a set of <br />preliminary recommendations regarding the sites that should be carried forward into <br />formulation of alternatives. Upon reviewing these recommendations, the TSG determined that <br />additional long-term alternative should be considered, namely, the enlargement of the existing <br />Stagecoach Reservoir. Substantial data on this alternative already existed in the Final EIS for <br />the Stagecoach Project. This permitted the site to be added and considered without conducting <br />additional field evaluation. The sites ultimately recommended for further consideration are <br />listed in Table S- 3. <br /> <br />Table S-3 <br /> <br />Sites Recommended for Further Consideration <br /> <br />1. Stagecoach Reservoir Enlargement <br />2. Elk Creek Off-channel Storage <br />3. Elkhead Reservoir Enlargement <br />4. Williams Fork near Hamilton <br />5. East Fork Williams Fork above Willow Creek <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT OF BASIN MODEL <br /> <br />Once the potential sites for new reservoir storage had been identified, the next objective <br />of the Study was to evaluate each site's potential for meeting future water needs in the basin. . <br />A hydrologic computer model of the basin was developed in order to quantitatively perform <br />these evaluations. In addition to simulating the basic hydrologic and water supply operations <br />in the basin, the model permits the inclusion of proposed reservoirs and water management <br />strategies and describes the resulting water deliveries, reservoir levels, and streamflow <br />conditions throughout the basin. <br /> <br />The model represents the hydrology, water demands, reservoir operations, and water <br />rights administration of the basin on a monthly basis over a 53-year hydrologic study period <br />encompassing water years 1930 through 1982. This is the same study period used in previous <br />modeling work performed by the Service to develop the Interim Flow Recommendations for <br />the recovery of the endangered fishes in the Yampa River. The period includes a wide range <br />of hydrologic conditions, from drought years to flood years, and permits an assessment of the <br />long-term effects of changes in water development and management. The results of model runs <br />were compared' in order to quantitatively determine the ability of different development <br />alternatives to meet basin water needs under a variety of operating assumptions. <br /> <br />Model Configuration <br /> <br />The Yampa River Basin Model was configured as a network of arcs and nodes and <br />utilizes network flow programming methods. Figure S-3 shows the basin model network. <br />This network representation of the basin has a physical appearance much like a map of the <br />river including tributaries, reservoirs and diversion points. The model accepts input of gaged <br />inflows and water demands, simulates the allocation of these flows to network arcs <br />representing various water rights and uses in the basin, and predicts the resulting streamflow <br />conditions in reaches of interest. The mathematical solution procedure of the model insures ' <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />S-IO <br /> <br />:~.:, <br />