My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10839
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10839
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.950
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Upper Colorado Comprehensive Framework Study
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1971
Title
Upper Colorado Region Comprehensive Framework Study - Appendix IV - Economic Base and Projections
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />i"~ <br />), -, <br />II~F'" <br /> <br />o <br />(,') <br />(.) <br />-.J <br />CJl <br />,... <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The projected expansion of irrigated agriculture in the Region, <br />to provide feed inputs for the livestock industry should be tho~oughly <br />reexamined; particularly in terms of national production potential and <br />requirements. In 1969 about 53 million acres of land were withdrawn <br />from agricultural production nationally. <br /> <br />Public or private investment in basic manufacturing, or other <br />types of local industries, in order to enhance regional economic <br />development for the well-being of all, could be more significant in <br />terms of social returns than additional development of irrigated <br />agriculture; particularly when measured in terms of regional employ- <br />ment'and personal income. <br /> <br />The economic impacts of private or public investment in regional <br />mineral resources development upon the rate and level of regional <br />economic growth as measured in terms of employment, personal income, <br />output, and relative contribution to gross regional product should <br />be determined. <br /> <br />Much analysis has been done to evaluate the economic and social <br />consequences of various land and water development programs. Future <br />studies will need to consider the environmental and ecological bal- <br />ance as critical measures of the desirability of proposed develop- <br />ments. However, this means that better methods of evaluating en- <br />vironmental am ecological consequences must be developed first., <br /> <br />The findings of the Upper Colorado Region Type I Study do not <br />provide solutions to all the questions or problems of land and water <br />management and development in the Region. The study will be most <br />useful if it is continuously updated and adjusted to reflect changing <br />conditions. For instance, recent projections of birth rates are lower <br />than those that were used as a basis for this study. Other relevant <br />variables are likely to change in a manner not foreseen in this study <br />and compensating adjustments will be necessary. <br /> <br />vi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.