Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.,,1 ~' <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />recommendation, however, that we direct the AG's office to not <br />file this application with the water court before the first of <br />December, and to not file the application with the water court <br />without approval by the Board. <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Second. <br /> <br />Janice: <br /> <br />Is there discussion? <br /> <br />David Harrison: <br /> <br />Yes, one other thing, just to elaborate. This is very cryptic, the <br />way we're doing it, but we are making the findings that are <br />required by statute for an instream flow appropriation, that is <br />inherent in the staff recommendation that's in the memorandum in <br />great detail, and I understand that to be a core part of this motion. <br /> <br />Ray Wright: <br /> <br />It is. <br /> <br />Janice: <br /> <br />If there is no further discussion, all those in favor? <br /> <br />All: <br /> <br />Aye. <br /> <br />Janice: <br /> <br />Opposed? <br /> <br />Ray Wright: <br /> <br />Then secondly, that we would, I would make a motion that AG's <br />office enter into the proposed stipulation with the Forest Service <br />regarding their forbearance in pursuing their own application on <br />their East Middle Creek filing at this time. <br /> <br />Alan: <br /> <br />Second. <br /> <br />Janice: <br /> <br />Further discussion? AU those in favor? <br /> <br />All: <br /> <br />Aye. <br /> <br />Janice: <br /> <br />Opposed? <br /> <br />Jennifer: <br /> <br />Okay, the last executive session item was regarding the <br />Hines/Highlands case that Dan briefed the Board on yesterday, this <br />is in respect to the findings, or the conclusions made by the court, <br />that a 25 year contract was not sufficient, and that you had to have <br />a signed executed contract in order to have a justifiable <br />augmentation plan. The Board discussed the policy implications <br />with this, in their concerns with respect to the use of Green <br />Mountain and Reudi to assist in development on the West Slope, <br />and I believe there is a motion for reconsideration being put <br />together by the State Engineer and other parties in that case, and <br /> <br />5" <br />