WSP10820

• File Number: 8282.200.10.D.2
• Description: UCRBRIP
• Basin: Colorado Mainstem
• Date: 5/22/1995
• Author: CWCB
• Title: UCRBRIP Program Board Memos Item 14 Transcription
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Board Memo

.'1,; )

Alan:

That is what I moved.

Janice:

And that was what the second was?

Patricia:

Yes.

Janice:

Any discussion? Okay, all those in favor?

All:

Aye.

Janice:

Opposed?

Jennifer:

Okay, that will be done. Wendy further updated on the Kansas
case, kind of what we can expect on the next phase, and
stratigizing for that, also talking about possible settlement options
in respect to the second phase of the Kansas case. That discussion
was very brief, more of an overview. Next the Board took up at
length the instream flow for the endangered fish in the fifteen mile
reach and the Yampa of future filings. However, I believe that
action has already been taken, and Board had its public discussion
on that, and there was really nothing different, so i think that is
sufficient.

Wendy then discussed the Orchard Mesa check case with the
Board, the Board gave her some direction and clarification on the
Clifton and Grand Junction, in dealing with Clifton and Grand
Junction. I forget, Wendy, did we need a Board action for that?

Wendy: (off/faint)

We need a Board action for guidance, and that really is not in
relation to the Orchard Mesa case, but to 94CW330, to the
Board to instream flow filing on _ Creek.

Jennifer:

Okay.

Eric Kuhn:

I would move that we instruct the Attorney General to sit down
with the City of Grand Junction and Clifton and to.. .I'm struggling
with the words here)... clarify on our behalf that it is not our intent
to prohibit those entities from making any changes, changing their
existing ditch rights in the GVIC to municipal use.

David Harrison:

Second.

Janice;

Any Board discussion?

David Harrison:

Let me just say something about it. Again, basically, the point of
this particular filing is quite limited. Our appropriate intent is to

~