Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />A mathematical simulation of the largely graphical pro- ~, <br />N cedures outlined by the U. S. Department of the Interior (1972).' <br />00 is summarized for a MSF desalting plant (including pretreatmen'f' <br />~ and post~treatment) in Table 1. In estimating capital costs for <br />~ construction, steam, site development, and land, the functions <br />are based on product water capacity, C. The same is true for <br />annual expenditures for labor and matePials, chemicals, fuel, <br />steam, and electricity. Interest during construction is deter- <br />mined by multiplying an estimate of construction time by one- <br />half of the interest rate and applying this result to the sum <br />of capital costs for construction, steam and site development. <br />Start-up costs are assumed to be equal to one month of the sum <br />of annuaL costs, whereas working capital is assumed to be twice <br />the start-up costs. Costs for "owner's general expenses" are <br />based on the level of investment in construction, steam facili- <br />ties, and site development. <br /> <br />It should be noted that the equations in Table 1 are <br />expressed in terms of English units in order to be congruent <br />with the ~rocedures in the source. Since this work is presented <br />in metric. units, the interested users of these models should <br />lllu~tiply product water capacity expressed in m3/day by 2.6417 x <br />lO 4 to convert to million gallons per day (mgd). In addition, <br />land prices in $ mi11ion/ha need to be multiplied by 0.4047 to <br />get $ million/acre; fuel rates in $/m:illion joules (MJoules) <br />need to bl= multiplied by 9.4787 x 10 -4 to get $/million BTU's <br />(MBTU) and electrical rates in $/MJoules need to be multiplied <br />by 2.7778 x 1Q ,-4 to get $/1000 kilowatt-hours (kwh). <br /> <br />Vertical Tube Evaporation - MSF <br /> <br />Another distillation process designed to maximize heat <br />transfer efficiencies is the vertical tube evaporator (VTE) <br />which has been by itself an alternative to MSF systems. However, <br />hybrid VTE-MSF processes have been shown to improve thermo- <br />dynamic efficiency, reduce brine pumping costs, and lower <br />structural costs due to several common elements (U. S. Department <br />of the Interior, 1972). Consequently, VTE by itself will not <br />be included in this costing analysis although it is helpful to <br />review its operation. <br /> <br />Like MSF systems, VTE processes make use of the principle <br />that water will vaporize at a progressively lower temperature <br />if associated also with progressively lower pressures. Unlike <br />the MSF process, vapor produced in any stage is condensed in <br />the succeeding stage to aid vapor formation therein (Figure 5). <br />In the VTE-MSF process, feedwater is pumped alternately from <br />MSF stageS to VTE effects. The desalting system is best applied <br />to the conditions noted earlier for the MSF process. <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />,,-. 'l'1 <br /> <br />" <br />, , <br /> <br />-:j <br /> <br />'j <br /> <br />-, <br />'.0 <br /> <br />'. <br />. <br /> <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />