Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 1. <br />~ <br />(X) <br />0 2. <br />0 <br /> 3. <br /> <br /> <br />To identify the saline water flows in the region as <br />to quality characteristics, flow magnitude and vari- , <br />ation, location with regards to power and labor <br />supplies, brine disposal, and environmental impact, <br />and requirements for collection and conveyance; <br />To determine the costs of desalting a fraction or <br />all of these flows to achieve a range of salinity <br />control in the river system; <br />To formulate an analytical procedure for selecting <br />an optimal level of desalination in an area where <br />other methods of control could also be used. This <br />procedure requires that the cost-effectiveness of <br />desalination be compared with similar relationships <br />describing the other alternatives, subject to a <br />salinity control potential, an agricultural, urban, <br />or industrial water development plan, and a policy <br />for maintaining or reducing salinity concentrations <br />basin-wide; and <br />4. To determine the specific data requirements, research <br />needs, and system parameters most influential on <br />the structure of a regional salinity control tech- <br />nology in order to insure reliability in its eventual <br />implementation and provide the basis for applying <br />these results to other salinity affected river systems. <br /> <br />The Upper Colorado River Basin contains vast reserves of <br />oil shale and coal essential to the future energy needs of the <br />nation. The rapidly growing urban centers of Denver, Salt <br />Lake City, and Albuquerque will require substantial interbasin <br />transfers to meet their water resource needs. These developments <br />will compound the already serious salinity problem in the basin <br />and steps must be taken to offset the expected damages. Because <br />of the serious nature of the salinity problem in the Lower <br />Colorado River Basin, the most binding constraints on future <br />water resource developments in the Upper Basin might very well <br />be salinity rather than each state's entitlement under the <br />Colorado River Compact of 1922. The specific recommendations <br />for resolving this problem are still being investigated with <br />the exception of possibly the decision to construct the desalting <br />facilities on the We1lton-Mohawk Drain. There has, however, <br />been a statement of policy by the basin states and the U. S. <br />E~vironmental Protection Agency to the effect that salinity <br />concentrations should be maintained at or below existing levels. <br />The EPA has supported salinity related investigations in the <br />basin for a number of years to identify alternative control <br />measures and their feasibility. The Bureau of Reclamation <br />through a Congressional mandate has been given the responsi- <br />bility of planning for and implementing salinity controls in <br />the basin. Both agencies will necessarily rely on previous <br />investigations in coordinating their policy and instigating <br /> <br />2 <br />