My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10807
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10807
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 11:12:08 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:32:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.137
Description
Colorado River Basin-Colorado River Basin Organizations/Entities-Colorado River Forecast Committee
Date
2/1/1984
Author
USDA, USDC, NOAA,NWS
Title
Water Supply Outlook for the Western United States
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001C7;l <br /> <br />PRECIPITATION DURING JANUARY WAS MUCH BELOW NORMAL OVER NEARLY ALL THE WE;l:iTERN <br />U.S. FOR MANY AREAS, THIS WILL HAVE BEEN THE DRIEST JANUARY OF THIS CENTURY. A5 A <br />RESULT NEARLY ALL STREAMFLOW VOLUME FORECASTS HAVE BEEN DOWNGRADED FROM. JANUARY I <br />AMOUNTS. HOWEVER WATER SUPPLIES ARE STILL EXPECTED TO BE ADEQUATE OVER HOST OF THE <br />WEST, BECAUSE OF ULJNDANT FALL PRECIPITATION. WHICH IN IUl{N LIW TO VERY HIGh. EARLY <br />SEASON SNOWPACKS. OF CONCERN ARE THE TRIBUTARIES EMANATING PROM THE MONtANA <br />ROCKIES. WHICH ARE EXPECTED TO YIELD BELOW NORMAL STREAMFLOW VOLUMES LATER ThIS <br />SPRING AND SUMMER. <br /> <br />1984 Snowmelt Seaeon <br />a8 of February 1 <br /> <br />General Outlook <br /> <br />With' most of the West receiving below average <br />precipitation during January, most torecasts indicate <br />volume flows to be less thsn those forecaBt on January <br />1. In spite of the low rainfall. much above average <br />streamflow is still expected from atreams heading in the <br />Sierra Nevada, Wasatch, and Colorado Rocky Mountains. <br />along with streams in the Great Basin. Streamflows will <br />be normal in o!1l1 other areas, with the exception of the <br />tributaries heading in the Montana Rock.ies and the <br />central Arizona streams, which will be below to much <br />below normal. <br /> <br />Precipitation was much below normal over the western <br />U.S. with a few exceptions. January 1984, over a large <br />portion of the West. will go down as the driest or nearly <br />the driest JSllUary this century. The only areas with <br />above normal monthly precipitation were western <br />Washington, the extreme northern portion of the Columbia <br />Basin in Britiah Columbia, central Wyoming, and small <br />portions in eastern Colorado and northeastern New Me~ico. <br /> <br />Even <br />January. <br />tied the <br /> <br />though precipitation was below average in <br />several snow courses in western Colorado set or <br />msximum of record for February I. Many other <br /> <br />areas in the West have much above normal snoWpack <br />accumulations, a9 well, as a result of the tremendous <br />snow accumulations in December. Much below norlllal <br />snowpscks exist in weatern Oregon, western Wo.shington. <br />central and northern Idaho, central Arizona, all of <br />western Montana, and nesrly all of the areas draining <br />into the Missouri River. <br /> <br />Spring and summer runoff is forecast to equal or <br />exceed normal in nearly all of the West's major rivers. <br />The Missouri River is the major exception and is expected <br />to yield only 79 percent of average at Fort Peck. <br />Montana. The Columbia River 18 expected to yield 94 <br />percent of its sverage and the Snake River 101 percent. <br />The Colorado River is forecast to produce 166 percent of <br />its average flow into Lake Powell, the Rio Grande 174 <br />percent, and the Arkansas 170 percent of normal. Nearly <br />all of the Great Basin streams are expected to flow in <br />excess of 130 percent, with sin percent expected for the <br />Lower Sevier drainage. Sierra Nevada streams will <br />produce slightly above normal on the west side and much <br />above normal on the east side. <br /> <br />Reservoir storage is still above average throughout <br />the West. High inflows are likely to push all lakes in <br />the Creat Basin to even higher water levels than last <br />year. in fact. higher water levels than have been <br />experienced in almost a century. <br /> <br />Basin by Basin Summary <br /> <br />SAN JOAQUIN, SACRAMENTO <br />AND NORTH COASTAL BASINS <br /> <br />After two lIIOnths of much above normal rainfall. a <br />large high pressure system became anchored over the west <br />c~ast, virtually ending all precipitation in California. <br />January 1984 will go dO\m in the record books aa the <br />driest or nearly the driest January this century. <br /> <br />Precipitation for the month of January averaged 5 <br />percent of normal throughout the state. Some locations <br />in the Southern Sierra reported no precipitation for the <br />month. However, due to large amounta of precipitation <br />received in November and December the seasonal <br />precipitation is still much above normal, averaging ISO <br />percent of norlPSl in the Sierra. <br /> <br />The extremely high water contents that existed on <br />January 1 have sustained the snowpack in the Sierra. The <br />water contents contributed during January are generally <br />10 percent of the normal January additions. Low <br />elevation snowpacks are well below average overall. The <br />maximum January contribution occurred at Jess Valley in <br />the northeastern corner of California with 30 percent of <br />its normal January increase. Upper San Joaquin aitea at <br />Huntington 1..s.ke and Plorence Lake had no snow water <br />content addition. Overall snowpack in the Sierra is near <br />average. <br /> <br />The annual water supply picture i9 still healthy. The <br />water year streamflow volumes are expected to range from <br />115 - 120 percent of average in the Northern Sierra, 140 <br />- 160 percent of average in the Central Sierra. and 135 - <br />145 percent of. average in the Southern Sierra. <br /> <br />COLUMBIA BASIN <br /> <br />The water supply outlook for the Columbia River and <br />Pacific coaatal basins shows a significant drop in the <br />projected runoff volume from the January 1 forecast. The <br /> <br />drop in projected volumes resulted from extremely dry <br />weather during the month of January. Overall the water <br />aupply outlook for the basin falls into the near-normal <br />to below-normal category. <br /> <br />Precipitation during the 1DDnth of January was 'Well <br />below-normal over the bulk of the basin. The Columbia <br />above Grand Coulee. Washington received 76 percent of <br />normal while the Snake River Basin above Ice Harbor <br />received only 40 percent of normal. Precipitation for <br />the Columbia Baain above The Dalles. Oregon was jU9t 63 <br />percent of normal. <br /> <br />With essentially dry weather during the month of <br />January, percentages of snoa/pack fell substantially <br />throughout the basin. In Canada. snoWp8cks in the Upper <br />Columbia were near norlll8l to slightly below normal. In <br />the Kootenay drainage and in much of Hontana and northern <br />Idaho the snoa/pack decreased to less than 70 percent. <br />The Salmon and Clearwater drainages reported in 80-90 <br />percent. Snake River tributaries in southern Idaho <br />remained above normal in the 120 to 190 percent bracket <br />but showed significant decreases from the January I <br />readings. Central Oregon snowpacks averaged about 140 <br />percent of normal. Higher elevation measurement in thljl <br />Oregon and Washington Cascades were slightly less normal <br />and lower elevations reported lesa thsn 50 percent of <br />normal. Near normal snoWpacks a/ere measured in the <br />interior basins of northern Washington and southern <br />Canada. <br /> <br />The January-July forecaat for the Columbia River at <br />The Dalles, Oregon calls for 103.0 million acre-feet or <br />97 percent of the 1961-1980 average. At Grand Coulee. <br />Washington. the January-July Columbia River flow is <br />forecast to be 60.0 million acre-feet or 93 percent of <br />normal. The total contribution from the Snake River <br />Basin. aa measured at Lower Granite Project, is forecast <br />to be 60.0 million acre-feet or 93 percent of norlPSl. <br />The total contribution from the Snake River Basin. as <br />measured at LOa/er Granite project. is forecast to be 34.6 <br />million acre-feet for the January-September period or 105 <br />percent of normal. The forecasts for the Pacific ~oastal <br />basins of Washington slipped into the 80 to 90 percent of <br />norlllSl bracket. The April-September forecast for the <br />Willametle River at Salem fell to 92 percent of normal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.