|
<br />.MEMORANDti
<br />August. 4. 1'47
<br />
<br />i
<br />,
<br />'%'''.,i
<br />.~"1
<br />li..I1!Wl:r,t;tl
<br />fl&1~r .
<br />
<br />'t'" /- 000905
<br />
<br />For: Gene1!al!. HanSJ Kramer. San Mateo. Californis
<br />GeorgeS;' lrnapP. Topeka. Kansas
<br />. .Don C. Bonduran't. Albuquerque. New Mexico
<br />
<br />FrOlll'~
<br />
<br />. .
<br />. , ' .
<br />C.L. Pa.i;te:r~<,n.;i>ei1Ve:r;'Col~r&ilo" ...~...
<br />. ",: '::"-'_'_"_"0" ,: "',;<'&I;,.:,:~~tyMt~:,, "\> :":\:}{~Y~~::;.:,::.-~ -,~~:<,;_~.,_' ,: ".
<br />SECTIONI! OF.ENGlNEER.ING.REl'QRT;'.,ANALYTICAL DAU
<br />
<br />, ;r ,":~
<br />
<br />.' ("'-x~'_:i
<br />
<br />Re::
<br />
<br />. ,"":"":~'-:< >
<br />
<br />, ..'..<":-:.
<br />
<br />,":',';.;
<br />
<br />. . ' .~- ."
<br />1.Sllotion I of the Engineering Report presente4-to~hE1
<br />Compact Commission 'the s'tre8.lld'10W1and diversi<iln da'tafor 190....1'l.i2
<br />and information oonoerning John Martin Reservoir. Certain "ether'
<br />datA". ooncerning rivergaiD.s andacoretions. which involved
<br />segreg~'ti\'lns; of~:I;!'~~lo1'f8' andiY/!l.~erJl'1Plllies by .!f.oUJ::~!l!l';a!!.~.;..",,; ......: .... ......." "
<br />and 'Delow,'Caddia'."'ittd';.~laii'llifioa1iions.tli.'el'eot"acoordi~IY..ia:81;u8aDl.'j...",~.\;;,...;,:"'" "i.:~.~:.,.!
<br />or unusable. wereOlllll.tted frarm Section I. These "Q'ther"'cl~!~~ '
<br />analyt~,~.character. and her. ein foroonvenienceare'terme. d.
<br />"~ses".Vnder the "mas'ter-plan" revision discusse~at
<br />meetings; in June at Topek:sl. and Denver. 'these. o'therd&.t.. Yfttrll'. .
<br />shif'teQ; in'to Seotion II _ .Analytical Da't&. where the resul'tSJ.o1'."
<br />firs't e.ne.lysell' were proposed to be disoussed. 'toge'therwi'th'resul'ta::
<br />of later or ".second analyses". being those undertaken inFe~ruary:
<br />1947 by the sUb-oommi'ttee 1'or'the period 1908-19l.i2' and inprepara't~on
<br />~ ~ ~
<br />o~,:\~h~ii~~',~~~,~,~,~~;,!~(~,~~,~~~::~,,:~~;,:,__~: -S~~~~~,!}i,\~-:WJ,t~:~:~ji.:'- ,: _ _ -." 1'~ ~~~tf ~ \~~"\' ~ ~ !~~~" c /f4?;:~.1""~i",(~, I~ ?
<br />
<br />;~re 'ful:~!!~~~~~E~:;:~~E~!~;~~4t::1a;~~!e~:~t:;~~,~,~~~'rr~:!~\;~ \
<br />
<br />neoessary. .. Since 'theresul'ta of, first and second analyses are ma.:t;erial1y ~'.
<br />different. by reason of their differen'tpurposea. ooncepts. .'theories" .
<br />&.nd assumptions. it is apparent thElt 'thepresen'tation ofbo.'thwoul,d"
<br />oonfuse the CoinpaotCommission andoanplicawtheproblemainvolvei3:in?
<br />the interstate negotiations. It is also&.p:paren't 'th&.t nei'ther' of the 'two
<br />analyses: are suitable for presen'tationsc long as 'there is: reasonablie
<br />doubt as 'to 'the l!,ccuracy and appHcabili'ty of 'the resul'ts or 'the ',analytical ,.
<br />prooedures involved ;in the,iroaloulation. My oonclusion.therefore.'is:. '..
<br />that proposed Section IIA'hould again be revised. 'to exclude&.ilanalytical
<br />dat&.. Instead. Sec'tion II should be devo'ted to the presenta'tion of s'tream-
<br />1'101fl, diversion and reservoir records; of y&&.rs subsequent 'to1l9l.i2~ am to
<br />discussions thereof similar to thee'prooedure 01' Seo'tion I inpresen'ting
<br />the dat&l forl90S-19l.i2. .
<br />
<br />,'-,",
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />"!'I;j ","''f'>'-'"
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />JI,<
<br />
<br />
<br />3. Early in its delibera'ti'ona 'the Engineering Commivt8e
<br />recognized 'th&.t the conditions and relations which prevailed. before John
<br />Marti)l Reservoir began 'to operate in January 1943. with respect to" the
<br />water supplies of the Arkansas River usable for irrigation. must be
<br />~
<br />
<br />-"..
<br />
<br />';.,
<br />
<br />..;1...
<br />
<br />. ~"~ ~___'_"h.-'.~ .. _,_,...,__~" ,_.".
<br />
<br />. . . '.- '.
<br />." "_.,-.,._,,.--,s-~,~-
<br />
<br />"~
<br />..f.,
<br />
<br />.ll
<br />
<br />.\ - -'j! -.,.~, ,
<br />,. """0"": ....
<br />;"-,~""<.,,.~.,,....~--~.
<br />
<br />"".c.,
<br />
<br />. ..;;,k:,';;c
<br />',',- "..1<_.__../;-"- :<f--,':'.
<br />
<br />1>'
<br />
<br />~.,. "'.;....,
<br />
|