Laserfiche WebLink
<br />...... <br />0) <br />-J <br />(XI <br /> <br />TABLE. 4-0 COMPARISON OF CC~~RCIAL PP~E WATER B~1CES FOR MODIFIED <br />IN SITU RETORTING TO PRODUCE 57,000 BBLS/DAY OF SHALE OIL <br />AND BYPRODUCT ELECTRIC POWER (a) <br /> <br />O {bl <br />xy <br /> <br />. . (cl <br />Rio B.1.ancQ <br /> <br />IN TO PLA.'1'!' <br /> <br />IN TO PLANT <br /> <br />~ <br />770ld1 <br /> <br />7,000 (e) <br /> <br />~ine Water <br /> <br />MIS Retort Water <br /> <br />MIS Retort Water <br /> <br />Mine Water <br /> <br />Runoff Water <br />Boiler Water of Combustion <br /> <br />7,770 <br /> <br />OUT OR CONSUMED <br /> <br />Stea:" into Retort 1,700 (d) <br /> <br /> <br />Cooling Tower Evapor. 3,370 <br /> <br />Shale Disp./Dust Contr. 750 <br /> <br />Spray Irrigation 1,000 <br /> <br />?rccess Uses 310 <br /> <br />OUT OR CONSUMED <br /> <br />Ste~ into Retort <br /> <br />Cooling Tower Evaporacicn <br />Shale Disposal/Dust Control <br /> <br />Spray Irrigation <br />~scellanecus Uses <br />E.vaporation <br />Power Generation Flue ~as Loss <br /> <br />Evaporation & Potable 40 <br />Mine Uses 300 <br /> <br />Construction Use <br /> <br />300 <br />7,770 <br />4,OOO-10,000(j) <br /> <br />~ne Drainage Water <br /> <br />Mine Orainage Water <br /> <br />~ <br />1,400 <br />275{e) <br /> <br />790 <br /> <br />530 <br /> <br />2,995 <br /> <br />SlO(f) <br />1:5(<;) <br />600(h) <br />600 ("l <br />100(i) <br /> <br />2'J <br /> <br />610 <br /> <br />2,995 <br /> <br />l1,250(kl <br /> <br />(al See Table 4-1 :or values. <br />(bl Data :rom Ref. 3, Table p. 196, Vol. 2, Ref. 2; Fig. III-J, Ref. 1. <br />(c) Data ~rcm Fig. 6-6-3, Ref. 5; "Water aal~"1ce" & Table 3-3-5, 9. 3-3-31, <br />Vol. 2, Ref. 4. <br />(d) Assumed to be the same as in Fig. III-J, Ref. 1. <br />{el Quantity required for balance taken to be excess mine water. <br />{fl Assumed equal to 1,880 evaporated - (610 flue gas loss + 330 cooling tower <br />evaporation + 130 misc. loss) = 810 qpm. Evaporatec quantity given in <br />Fig. 6-6-3, Ref. 5 & other values given in water bala~ce on p. 3-3-31, <br />Vol. 2, Ref. 4. <br />(g) Estimated to be 35\ of COOling tower loss. of 330 gpm (:oornote (f)) from <br />figures given for circulating cooling water in Table 3-3-5, Vol. 2, ~ef. 4. <br />(h) Assumed to. be same value for ~~retorted as for retorted shale. <br />(il Estimated at 75\ (57,000/76,000) of misc. loss of l30 gpm {footnote (:)). <br />(j) Projected maximum. <br />(k) Personal communication (July 1978) from C-b Oil Shale Ven~ure i~dica~es <br />higher upper limi~ possible. <br /> <br />73 <br />