Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f.-... <br /> <br />en only 15 percent processed in T~sco II retorts, the water ~anagement scheme is <br /> <br />CT) similar to that for the Tosco II design2. This is ascribed to the fact that <br />(Ji <br /> <br />the~rocessed spent shale will contain about 9 percent rnois~ure by weigh~, <br /> <br />requi:ing all of the process and cooling wastewaters for mois~urizi~g as well <br /> <br />as additional makeup from the White River itself. In fact over 60 percent of <br /> <br />the water required for moisturizing the sgent shale for disposal would be <br /> <br />fresh water f~om the White River. <br /> <br />The wastewaters that will be discussed include runoff, boiler feedwater <br /> <br />makeup trea~T.ent blcwdown, cooling tower blowdown, retorting anc u~qrading <br /> <br />wastewaters, and domestic wastes frcm the plant. ~e have assumed t~at the~e <br /> <br />is no excess mine drainage water procuced during the surface ret:.or~ing process. <br /> <br />If there is, t~e trea~~ent or ~andling of these excess g~oundwaters can be <br /> <br />car~ied out in a manner described in Section 4.2. The wastewater ~u~'tities <br /> <br />for t~e Tosco II process will be estirna~ed although ~e cos~s of was~ewa~er <br />treatmene are considered to be zero since all of the wastewater is us~d fe: <br />spent shale disposal~ The various treatment options have bee~ discussec ~n <br />Section 2 and will no~ be repeated. <br />The ~a~er guan~ities presented in this section will be based upon a <br />50,000 barrel/day plan~. There are, however, different interpretations c: ~he <br />, <br />meaning of ~~is size plant in te~s of the product output. In the ?araho desic~4 <br />the ~ominal out?ut is expressed in terms of the crude shale oil prccuction, <br />d . 2 , 10 h <br />while the Tcscc es~g~ expresses the out?ut as t e sum of the uccrraded <br />liquid fuels. !~ order ~o have a uniform basis :or comparing ci==srent retorting <br />procedures and different grades of oil shale, a standard size oil shal~ cocplex <br />will be one that is designed to praduce 50,000 bar~els/day of synthetic crude <br />pl~s any byproducts not utilized as plant fuel. The total heating value of <br />the basic product fuel is 2.9 x loll Btu/day4. The sized shale feed rate in <br />the Paraho Direct and Indirect processes to produce 50,000 barrelS/day of <br />synthetic crude is 87,350 and 100,000 tons/day of 30 gal/ton shale. respec~ively, <br />while in the Tosco II process the sized shale feed rate is 73,350 tons/day of <br /> <br />35 gal/ton shale <br /> <br />The water quanti-:.ies will be specified for both the "50,000 <br /> <br />barrelS/day design" and a plant producing 50,000 bar~els/day of synthetic <br />crude, ~here synthetic c~de for Paraho means pumpable crace shale oil and for <br />Tasca II means partially ~pgraded shale oil. <br /> <br />60 <br />