My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10774
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10774
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:39 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:31:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.200
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Development and History - UCRB 13a Assessment
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1979
Title
Costs of Wastewater Disposal in Coal Gasification and Oil Shale Processing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />Jl Our information and costs for Resin Adsorption are based on phenol, not <br /> <br />r.. COD. If it works on the blowdown, it will cost about $2.0/1000 gals <br /> <br />(= S652/acre-ftl, but we cannot ~redict the quality. It will be used in the <br /> <br />makeu~ only if it gives an im~roved quality over biological oxidation. Whether <br /> <br />it will or not is unknown at this tL~e. <br /> <br />Carbon Adsorption may, tentatively, be expected to <br />. 28 29 <br />effluent. Eased an 1973 costs from Hutch~ns ' , we <br /> <br />give a good quality <br />4' <br />found ll~/lb COO removed . <br /> <br />Today.s costs are neare: 15~/lb COO. This translates as <br /> COO Removed <br /> (mg/l) $/1000 gals <br /> 10,000 12.5 <br /> 5,000 6.2 <br /> 1,000 1.2 <br /> 500 0.6 <br /> <br />Culp and Shuckrow, for very large mur.icipal plants with low COD loadi~~s, <br />found SO.6/1000 gals (= Sl96/acre-ftl. <br />The cost of the use of carbon is so de~endent on the COD that we cannot <br /> <br />safely ~redict it. Carbon will only be used if the costs are <br /> <br />Wet Oxidation is likely to be a reliable general purpose <br /> <br />less than alte~natives_ <br />31 <br />trea~ent , but <br /> <br />che cost will be more ~~an $6/1000 gals ($195~'acre-ft). Wet oxidation can <br />take t~e place of carbon adsorbtion Eor ~gh concen~rations. <br />In sum, in plants having the maximum organic content in the c~oling tower <br />blowdown, a great ~provement in quality can be obtained by biological trea~~ent <br />nf the makeup at a cost of S2.4 to $5.6/1000 gals of blowdcwr,. A better <br />quality probably can be obtained by carbon adsorption or wet oxidative t:ea~ent <br />of the blowdown at more ~~an $6/1000 gals of blowdown. Salt removal will be <br />by forced eva~oration at an additional cost of $6-11/1000 gals. Impoundment <br />with, or without any of the above treatments, costs about $4.60/1000 gals. <br />2.9 Domes~ic Wastes ~rom Plant <br />A discussion on the quality and treatment of ~astewaters from pctable and <br />domestic usage is found in Section 4.5. The quantity of wastewater is relatively <br />small, about 28 gpm (= 45 acre-ft/yr). <br /> <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.