Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:~o. ~ <br /> <br />nsus <br /> <br />-1, 1-2, 1-3 5u~ary of was~ewater streans <br /> <br />2-1 Sailer feec:dater r6Ciuirene::cs for ....::l~.ious sasification p::'oceSS-2:5 <br />producing 250'x 10 sef/day gas. <br /> <br />Specifications for boiler feed ~a~er treatrn~nt systems for Lurgi <br />ol~it i~ N~~ M~xico. <br /> <br /> 2-2 <br />.... <br />::-:J 2-3 <br />:':) <br />::J <br /> 2-4 <br /> 2-5 <br /> 2-6 <br /> 2-7 <br /> 2-8 <br /> 2-~ <br /> 2-10 <br /> 2-11 <br /> 2-12 <br /> 3-1 <br /> <br />3-2 <br />3-3 <br />3-4 <br /> <br />3-5 <br /> <br />3-6 <br /> <br />4-1 <br /> <br />4-2 <br /> <br />Cost estimates (in thousands of collars) for boiler feedwater treat- <br />ment at Lurgi piant in New Mexico. <br /> <br />Waste from boiler feedwater treat:ncnt at. Lurgi plant in New l1e:<ico. <br /> <br />Quantities of foul process cgndensate for various gasification <br />precesses p~cducing 250 x 10 sef/day g~s. <br /> <br />Ex?erience with bio-oxidation of phenolic refinery wastewater in a <br />cooling to'oer. <br /> <br />Phenosolv~, plant performance - Sasol facility. <br /> <br />Treated concensate (calculated) f~ora Phenosolvan process. <br /> <br />Probable ccmposition of makeup to cooling' tower in Lurgi plant <br />(50\ from river and 50\ treated process condensate effluent). <br /> <br />Suggested 1i~ts on the conta~ination of makeup water for a cooling <br />tower. <br /> <br />Approxioate material and ener~I i~fo~ation on a 65\ efficient coal <br />gasification pl~~t. <br /> <br />Estimate of concentrations in cooling syste~ blowdown. <br /> <br />?age <br />2a, 2b, 2c <br /> 19 <br /> 21 <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> 28 <br /> 33 <br /> 35 <br /> 36 <br /> 37 <br /> 37 <br /> 45 <br /> 47 <br /> <br />Unrecovered beat recovered by wet cooling, overall conversion efficienc/ <br />and water evaporated in an oil shale pl~'t producing 50,000 barrel/day <br />synthetic crude. . 62 <br /> <br />Analysis of paraho Direct process retort wastewater. <br /> <br />Analysis of retort water frc~ Tosco II process. <br /> <br />Approxima~e composi~ion of Tosco II combined process retorting and <br />upgrading wastewater. <br /> <br />Quantities of process water strea-~ for oil shale plants producing <br />50,000 barrels/day of synthetic crude. <br /> <br />Quality of sour water stripper bottoms. <br /> <br />Comparison of commercial phase product and pl~'t parameters for <br />modified in situ retorting. <br /> <br />Compari5on of c~ercial phase water balances for modizied in situ <br />. retorting to produce 57,000 barrels/day of shale oil and byproduct <br />elect2:ic power. <br /> <br />65 <br />65 <br /> <br />66 <br /> <br />67 <br />~7 <br /> <br />72 <br /> <br />73 <br />