My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10774
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10774
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:39 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:31:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.200
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Development and History - UCRB 13a Assessment
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1979
Title
Costs of Wastewater Disposal in Coal Gasification and Oil Shale Processing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~.."" <br />en <br />w:::.. <br />M':>o <br /> <br />be ~he most economical of the processes we have studied. A PH05h~-W plant for <br />the exemplar! Lurgi stream would require about $107 of equipment (installed), <br />consume 1.6 lb steam per gal wastewater treated, and have a cooling water <br />consumption (by evaporation) of 0.1 gal per gal wastewater treated. Cooling <br />water consumption can be reduced by 60\ by using air coolers, but a~ additional <br />capital cost. The total operating cost is $7.4 x 106 per year, or $7.80/1000 <br />gals of feed water, or 9.4~/106 Stu product output6 Credit for ammonia sales <br />cover the cost of this treatment. <br />The same column can yield a product water having about 14 ppm ammonia if <br />the stripping steam rate is doubled at an additional cost of about $2.7/1000 <br />gals. As stated in the preceding section, we have not studied t~is aspect. <br />The additional cost of $2.7/1000 gals is a maximum. It may be cheaper to use <br />a larger column and less steam or to follow stripping with biological nit~i2ication. <br /> <br />Solvent Extraction <br /> <br />In solvent extraction a solvent is intimately mixed with t~e ~aste~ater <br />in contacting devices in ~hich the phenols are transferred to the solvent <br />phase. The mixture ~~en enters settlinq vessels to separate the solvent and <br />~ater streams. Several stages are required eo achieve adequate phenol removal. <br />As a typical example, ~~o trains of six mixer settler stages each plus solvent <br />recovery ~quipment costing $14.6 x 106 (installed) are required to remove 99\ <br />6 <br />of the phenol from a 2,000 gpm, 6,000 ppm phenol wastewater stream. Such a <br /> <br />stream could oe obtainec from a Lurgi commercial scale qasification plan~~ <br />maintenance amounts to $2.93 ~ 106 per <br /> <br />The cost in capital <br /> <br />inves t:nen t and <br />6 <br />gals treated . <br /> <br />Costs are not dependent on influent concent~a~ion, <br /> <br />year, or $2.80/1000 <br /> <br />but costs can be decreased by reducing the removal efficiency. The lowest <br />acceptable removal efficiency, as determined by both water reuse and environmental <br />constraints. is not known. <br /> <br />At 80' efficiency only one or two theoretical stages are required, and <br />the number cf stages is not strongly dependent on the distribution coefficient <br />of the solvent. At 99' efficien~ll six to seven theoretical stages are <br />required, al~~ough these can be reduced either by increasing the amount of <br />solvent used. or by using a solvent with a higher distribution coef:icien~. <br />As the solvent distribution coefficient is increased, the number of stages <br />and/or the amount of solvent for a given removal efficiency can be decreased. <br /> <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.