Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />9.2.6 Native American Tribes <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />One of the principal concerns of the USBR in preparation of this environmental assessment was the need <br />to address potential impacts of the proposed action on any IT As. Four tribes were contacted by USBR <br />(J..javaju Naiiun, jicariiia Apacnt: Naiion, SOUlhem Ure indian Tribe, and [he Ute ivioumain Ure indian <br />Tribe) and potential effects of this project on their water rights were discussed. Support for and <br />concurrence of this project was received from each of the tribes during negotiations which resolved <br />specific tribal water right trust issues for those tribes. No other ITA issues were seen as potentially being <br />affected by this project and, therefore, no further consultation was initiated. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />9.2,6.1 <br /> <br />Water Resources Department, Navajo Nation <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A meeting was held on September 16,1994, at the offices of the Water Resources Department. The <br />attendees were Teresa Showa (Director, Water Resources Management), Michael Johnson and George <br />Roussos (Water Resources Department). Stanley Pollack (Navajo Nation), Cindy Murray and Henry <br />Townsend (PNM), and Jens Deichmann (Resource Science Group [RSG]). The purpose of the meeting <br />was to (1) advise the Navajo Nation representatives of the proposed action, (2) solicit information on <br />concerns the Navajo Nation might have regarding the proposed action and (3) solicit any help the Nation <br />could provide in identifying possible IT As which should be addressed in the environmental assessment. <br />Issues raised in the meeting relevant to the proposed action included: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. Impact of the water diversion weir on the recent designation of the San Juan River as critical <br />habitat for the Colorado pikeminnow. <br />. The effect of withdrawal of water from the San Juan River on the already reportedly high <br />concentration of selenium in the river. (It was recognized that the high selenium levels west of <br />the Hogback are due in large part to naturally high levels in the surrounding soils.) <br />. The impact of PNM's and other non-Native American withdrawals from the river on the ability of <br />the Navajo Nation to withdraw water without affecting the ability of other Indian tribes to do <br />likewise. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />No other specific ITAs were identified. <br /> <br />9.2.6.2 <br /> <br />Southern Ute Indian Tribe <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A meeting was held at the offices of the Southern Ute Energy Resource Division (ERD) on September 23, <br />1994. In auendance were: Robert Santistevan (Director, ERD); Michael Frost (Director, Environmental <br />Program); John Washington (Natural Resources Division); Janice Sheftel (Maynes, Bradford, Shipps and <br />Sheftel, representing the Southern Ute Tribe); Cindy Murray, David Huffman, and Henry Townsend <br />(PNM); and Jens Deichmann (RSG). The purpose of the meeting was to advise the Southern Ute <br />representatives of the proposed action, and to solicit information on concerns the Southern Utes might <br />have regarding the proposed action and any help the tribe could provide in identifying possible IT As <br />which should be addressed in the environmental assessment. The only issue raised in the meeting that <br />related to the proposed action was concern over elevated selenium levels in the San Juan River. No IT As <br />were identified by the Southern Ute representatives as potentially at risk as a result of the proposed action. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />n n '1 r' .' '"\ <br />. q l .J <br />