Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mitigation measures described for other resource categories may require further cultural resource review, <br />however. For instance, the planning and construction of the fish passage (described in section 6.4.3.1) will <br />undergo cultural resources review in consultation with the New Mexico State Historic Preservation <br />Officer and/or Navajo Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, as appropriate. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6.9.4 irnpacIs oi Criner Aiiernalives <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The implementation of anyone of the other alternatives described in this document, the Alternative <br />Sources of Water (Section 4.2) or the No Action Alternative (Section 4.3) could result in significant <br />impacts to cultural resources. The conversion of water from irrigation to M&I (as described in Section <br />4.2.1) could impact cultural landscapes and traditionallifeways in the area. The development of <br />groundwater sources (as described in Section 4.2.2) could result in ground-disturbing activities with the <br />potential to affect archeological resources. Under the No Action Alternative, ground-disturbing activities <br />associated with power plant and weir removal (and appurtenant features) has the potential to affect <br />historic properties. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6.9.5 Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Action Alternative <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />No mitigation measures are proposed since the nature of the proposed action is such that there is no <br />potential to cause effects to historic properties. This recommended determination will be submitted to the <br />New Mexico State Historic Preservation Officer for concurrence. USSR will also consult with the <br />Jicarilla Apache Nation, the Navajo Nation, through its Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. and other <br />tribes who may have a cultural affiliation with the area. Consultation in regards to activities such as fish <br />passage construction (Section 6.9.3) will occur as a separate undertaking from the Proposed Action <br />Alternative. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />7.0 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE RESOURCE COMMITMENTS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A number of human and natural resources would continue to be affected if the Jicarilla Apache Nation <br />Water Subcontract is approved. The irreversible and irretrievable nature of each of these is discussed in <br />the following subsections. Because no new construction is proposed as part of the proposed action, no <br />new irreversible and irretrievable commitments ofland, biota, archeology, or paleontology will be made. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />7.1 Water <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Although water is considered a renewable resource, water consumed as a result of the proposed action <br />would be lost to alternative uses for the life of the subcontract. At the termination of the Subcontract. the <br />amount of water that had been used annually will be available for other uses. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />7.2 Coal <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Coal extracted at the adjoining San Juan Mine and nearby La Plata Mine would continue to be consumed <br />by the SJGS. Approximately 6.6 million tons of coal were burned by SJGS in 1999. Future years' <br />consumption will vary in proportion to the capacity factor. Once burned, the coal is irretrievable. <br /> <br />44 <br /> <br />O(J153~ <br />