Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6,2.3 Impacts of the Proposed Action <br /> <br />Implementation of the proposed action would create no new impacts on the hydrology, water quality, or <br />sediment quality of the project area or downstream of the area. In addition. the best available information <br />indicates that the current operations, which would continue as a result of implementation of the proposed <br />action, are not causing signIfIcant impacts to the hydrology, water quality, or sediment quality, either In <br />the project area or downstream. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6.2.4 Impacts of the No Action Alternative <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In the event that the Jicarilla Apache Nation Water Subcontract was not approved for the consumption of <br />16,200 AF by SJGS, that PNM was unable to acquire the same amount from other sources. and that SJGS <br />was consequently forced to cease operating, there would be minimal impacts on the hydrology, water <br />quality, or sediment quality. In such an event, the following would be expected to occur: <br />. The weir, diversion structure, and pumping facility would be removed and reclaimed. Any sediments <br />held behind the weir would be released downstream. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. The 16.200 AF of water now being diverted under the USBRlPNM contract would not be used for <br />power generation, and would thus be available for some other use, either upstream or downstream of <br />the project site. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />It should be noted that under this scenario. while use of the water by PNM for the operation ofSJGS <br />might cease. the subject water could be released for other uses. Those uses could include those by <br />facilities similar to SJGS. <br /> <br />6,2.5 Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Action Alternative <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />No mitigation measures are proposed since there is no evidence that the amount of water proposed for <br />consumption by SJGS is sufficient to have an adverse impact on the water quality or sediment quality of <br />the San Juan River, nor is the amount being consumed sufficient to affect the use of the river by others <br />under current normal flow conditions. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6.3 Fish Aud Wildlife <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Fish and wildlife resources identified in the vicinity ofSJGS are discussed in the following section, as <br />well as the environmental conditions that provide habitat to the wildlife. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6.3.1 Existing Environment <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The SJGS is located within the Shumway Arroyo tributary drainage to the San Juan River (Figure 1). The <br />weir and pump station are located directly on the San Juan River, which is a perennial stream (Figure 3). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The majority of the Shumway Arroyo drainage basin is broad alluvial fans and flats. The area includes <br />occasional sandstone-capped mesas and cuestas within the alluvial flats. The surficial soils in the area <br />range from sandy loams in the upper part of the basin to clayey loams in the lower parts (BHP 1992). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The SJGS is located primarily in grassland and shrub/grass habitats. Grasses of the area include galleta <br />(Hilariajamesii), Indian ricegrass (Orv=opsis hVlllel/oides). alkalai sacaton (Sporobolis airoides), fescues <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />OUl~12 <br />