My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10769
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10769
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:31:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Navajo
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/2001
Author
BOR
Title
Revised Draft Environmental Assessment for the Jicarilla Apache Nation Water Subcontract-aka USBR/PNM Water Contract Renewal and Extension
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />contained in the limestone. Briefly, the process involves spraying the reactive slurry into the gas stream. <br />The SO, in the gas stream reacts with the water and calcium carbonate, forming solid particles of calcium <br />sulfite and calcium sulfate. With the addition of oxygen, the calcium sulfite is force oxidized to calcium <br />sulfate. These particles are constantly removed in the form of waste slurry. Supporting systems to prepare <br />and feed fresh limestone slurry, thicken and dewater the waste slurry, and disposalpfthe solid waste are <br />piv'\"id~d, ilt:ii.ilt;lIg ili it lUli11 FGD :,y~it::lII. Tilt: FGD system is designed to scrub up to 100 percent of the <br />flue gas. although bypass capability is necessary due to boiler and electrostatic precipitator (ESP) design. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The FGD system includes: limestone handling system, absorbent preparation system, absorber system, <br />primary and secondary dewatering system, and gypsum handling system. <br /> <br />6,1.2 Current Information on .Emissions <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 2 summarizes the SJGS air emission limits. <br /> <br />6,1.3 Impacts of the Proposed Action <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Under the proposed action, air emissions by the SJGS would continue subject to current and future federal <br />and state air quality regulations and standards, through the projected life-of-plant. SJGS is in compliance <br />with the terms and conditions of all applicable air regulations. SGJS has.not had a particulate emissions <br />notice of violation (NOV) since 1985 brought on by mechanical difficulties with the Unit 4 precipitator. <br />These difficulties were repaired, retested. and SJGS has demonstrated compliance ever since. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6.1.4 Impact of the No Action Alternative <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />If the proposed action is not implemented and ifPNM is unable to acquire sufficient alternative water <br />supplies to allow it to continue to operate SJGS, operations at SJGS would cease. Under this scenario, <br />emissions of SO" NO" and particulates would cease and air quality could correspondingly improve from <br />the cessation of those emissions. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6.1.5 Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Action Alternative <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Air pollution control equipment has already been installed at SJGS that allows the plant to continue to <br />meet applicable federal and state air emission standards. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6.2 HydrologylWater Quality/Sediment Quality <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The operation of the SJGS and ancillary facilities theoretically could have the potential to affect the San <br />Juan River. a large perennial stream upon which the SJGS relies for its water supply, and Shumway <br />Arroyo and its tributary, Westwater Arroyo. Shumway Arroyo discharges into the San Juan River from <br />the north approximately 4.5 miles downstream of the pump station. <br /> <br />The San Juan River is characterized by large spring snowmelt peak flows, low summer and winter base <br />flows, and high magnitude, short duration summer and fall storms. The completion of Navajo Dam in <br />1963 reduced the spring snowmelt peak by about 50 percent and increased the base flow during the <br />months of August through February by about 170 percent. Minimum flows were also elevated, and near- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />t5 <br /> <br />O ~ 1. n <br />U J ;1'. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.