Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r- <br />an <br />OJ <br />.-I <br />o <br />C <br /> <br />cies; made field inspection trips to the <br />Colorado River; and reviewed pertinent re- <br />ports of the Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau <br />of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, and other <br />agencies. <br />On November 18, 1969, the task force sub- <br />mitted a draft report entitled "Recommend- <br />ed State Policy on the Lower Colorado River <br />Management Program" to Secretary Liver- <br />more for his consideration. At the close of <br />1969, the task force's draft report was being <br />reviewed by all concerned State agencies. <br /> <br />Yuma Division Report. The final re- <br />port of the Bureau of Reclamation entitled <br />"Report on Comprehensive River Manage- <br />ment Plan, Lower Colorado River, Yuma <br />Division," dated May 1969, was approved on <br />August 15, 1969. With only minor changes to <br />reflect review comments, the final report re- <br />mains essentially the same as the original <br />draft dated April 1966. The plan provides for <br />dredging of 17.4 miles of river channel from <br />Laguna Dam to a point about two miles <br />above Morelos Dam and for clearing of <br />phreatophyte growth to maintain flood <br />capacity between existing levees. <br />Of the total construction cost of $4,681,000, <br />about 33 percent is proposed for fish and <br />wildlife and recreation purposes. This is the <br />largest percentage for these purposes that has <br />been proposed for any division in the Lower <br />Colorado River Management Plan. The plan <br />does not include some of the off-channel <br />water areas proposed by the Lower Colorado <br />River Land Use Office because they would <br />result in a consumptive use of water for <br />which there is no authorized entitlement. <br />The report states that the State of Arizona <br />can request that a portion of its Colorado <br />River water entitlement be set aside to meet <br />these consumptive uses; then, if the Secretary <br />of the Interior concurs, the extra features <br />could be incorporated into the plan. Howev- <br />er, the report also states that until augmenta- <br />tion of the river is achieved from other <br />sources, efforts must be made to achieve even <br />better use of water than previously planned <br />and that recreation needs may have to be met <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />with less elaborate installations than those <br />heretofore proposed. <br />Parker Division Report. Also during <br />the year, the Bureau of Reclamation's final <br />report on the Parker Division was approved <br />on September 19, 1969. The report, dated <br />March 1969, presents a plan for stabilization <br />and control of 32.4 miles of Colorado River <br />Channel from Parker, Arizona, to a point <br />about 3 miles above Palo Verde Diversion <br />Dam. The upper 14 miles of the channel im- <br />provement work has already been completed <br />because of the greater urgency of the work <br />caused by river front development on the <br />Colorado River Indian Reservation. In the <br />lower portion of the Parker Division, the <br />channel will be improved by excavation and <br />realignment; however, this work has been <br />temporarily deferred because of the un- <br />resolved status of the claims by the Colorado <br />River Indian Tribes for lands in the lower 15 <br />miles of the designed channel and the desire <br />of the Indians to avoid construction which <br />may influence the adjudication of title <br />claims. <br />The work proposed in the Parker Division <br />will include improvement of about 600 acres <br />of open water in abandoned oxbows and off- <br />channel backbays for fishing and recreation. <br />About 22 percent of the estimated project <br />cost of $11,869,000 will be for fish and wild- <br />life and recreational features. Not all of the <br />recreation-oriented features proposed by the <br />Lower Colorado River Land Use Office were <br />incorporated into the comprehensive plan re- <br />port because of the unavailability of water <br />for the proposed increased water surface <br />areas. The Bureau report states that the chan- <br />nelization work will salvage 24,200 acre-feet <br />of water annually and reduce the sediment <br />transported by the river by 788,400 tons per <br />year. Reduction of the amount of sediment <br />arriving at Imperial Dam will produce the <br />dual benefits of: extending the life of the Im- <br />perial backwater lakes, which are important <br />fish and wildlife and recreational resources, <br />and reducing the quantity of sediment that <br />must be handled at the Imperial Dam Desilt- <br />ing Works. <br />