Laserfiche WebLink
<br />N <br />~ <br />0') <br />.-l <br />C, <br />o <br /> <br />grammed. The Bureau of Reclamation ex- <br />pects that intensive work will be under way <br />in fiscal year 1971. <br /> <br />Long-range Water Resources <br />Planning Schedule <br />During 1969 Mr. W. Don Maughan, Chief <br />of the Interstate Planning Branch, Depart- <br />ment of Water Resources, prepared a long- <br />range water resources planning network dia- <br />gram comparing the time requirements to <br />develop five types of water projects. Based on <br />this diagram, a somewhat simplified and re- <br />vised network diagram was prepared and is <br />shown on Plate 4. <br />Under the assumption that California <br />needs its next major water supply by year <br />2000, the diagram shows that a decision as to <br />which type of project or combination of <br />projects to construct should be made by 1979. <br />None of the time requirements are precise <br />and all are subject to change. However, the <br />diagram does indicate that, based on present <br />knowledge, an orderly schedule required to <br />complete the necessary work in order to meet <br />the 1979 date is from 10 to 13 years, as shown <br />on Plate 4 and the following tabulation: <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF PLANNING NETWORK DIAGRAM <br />(Years Required for Various Step.) <br /> <br />Water Source <br />Western States <br />Water Project ................ <br />Weather Modification- .... <br />Second State <br />Water Project ................ <br />Desalting............................ <br />Water Conservation <br />and Reuse ...................... <br /> <br />Prelimin~ry <br />Reports, <br />Feasibility <br />Studies, <br />Prototype A uthoriution, <br />Construction Design gnd <br />and Operation Construction <br /> <br />Totsl <br />Time <br /> <br />13 21 <br />12 16 <br /> <br />J4 <br />28 <br /> <br />10 16 <br />12 17 <br /> <br />26 <br />29 <br /> <br />12 20 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />.Time requirements uncertain. <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />The tabulation shows that a Western <br />States Water Project would be the water <br />source requiring the longest time both in <br />steps required prior to a decision and in the <br />time to complete works after a decisi,on is <br />made. These conclusions are consistent with <br />previous studies by the Colorado River <br />Board. <br /> <br />Review and Analysis of Reports <br />The Board staff reviews and analyzes re- <br />ports on water resources developments by <br />federal, state, local, and private agencies for <br />the purpose of providing factual evaluations <br />to aid the Board in its deliberations. <br /> <br />Among the more significant reports con- <br />cerning Regional Water Development re- <br />viewed during 1969 were: <br /> <br />1. "Water and Choice in the Colorado Basin," Na- <br />tional Academy of Sciences. <br /> <br />2. "Canadian Waters and Arid Lands, " E. Roy Tin- <br />ney. <br /> <br />J. "Oregon's Long-Range Requirements for Wa- <br />ter," State of Oregon, Water Resources Board. <br /> <br />4. "Utah Desalting Study," State of Utah, Office of <br />Saline Water, Atomic Energy Commission. <br /> <br />5. "Joint Mexico-United States Study of Combined <br />Nuclear Power and Desalting Plant," Joint Mex- <br />ico-United States Study Team. <br /> <br />6. "Statistical Aspects of Rain Stimulation-Prob- <br />lems and Prospects," Lovasich, Neyman, Scott, <br />and Smith, Statistical Laboratory, University of <br />California, Berkeley, <br />