Laserfiche WebLink
<br />w <br />~.. <br />~ <br />QQ <br /> <br />after the first irrigation. However, most sites were over- <br />irrigated enough to cause considerable deep percolation and reduce <br />application ,efficiency. This is discussed in more detail under <br />irrigation adequacies at sites. <br /> <br />Deep Percolation: Irrigation data collected from monitoring sites <br />in 1993 shows that about one-third of the farmers over-irrigated.. <br />heavfly. Over half (;f the' irrigators had 10.... deep percolation. and <br />under-irrigated most of the time. The remaining i~rigators had <br />. medium deep percolation and under-irrigated or over-irrigated at <br />.times. . <br /> <br />The seasonal deep percolation losses for the 22 sites are shown in <br />Table 2 ....hich has been extracted from individual irrigation <br />summaries provided in Appendix D. Also, detailed deep percolation <br />values for each surface irrigated site by irrigation events are <br />provided in Table 3. These are shown in two formats, as acre <br />inches per acre and as a percentage for each individual irrigation <br />event. . . <br /> <br />'~~ ~ . <br />The average annual deep percolation in the Grand Valley ....as <br />originally estimated to be 11 acre inches per acre, which results <br />in approximately four tons of salt pickup per acre foot (see <br />Appendix F) reaching the Colorado River. Ho....ever, monitoring data <br />for the last nine years indicate the average deep percolation to be <br />slightly less than 16' acre inches per acre. (Table 4). '. . <br />, <br /> <br />Irr 1"993, the av~rage deep percolation foral'l 22 s1 tes' which' <br />consisted of '20 surface sites and 2 sideroll sprinklers ....as 11.8 <br />inches (Table 2); a decrease of 4.9 inches p~r acre compared to <br />1992. The 20 surface sites consisted of 8 sites with surge system <br />and 12 without surge (conventional irrigation). Deep percolation <br />for the 12 conventional sites was 18.5 inches and 4.3 <br />inches for the 8 surge sites (Table 2). A reduction of 14.2 inches <br />per acre in deep percolation was achieved with surge 'irrigation. <br />The average for ,the two'sprinkler' sites was 1.2 inches (Table 2). <br />The deep percolation valuessho....non Tables 2 and 4 are average <br />values obtained from both surface and sprinkler irrigated sites. <br /> <br />Irrigation data from the 22 monitoring sitessho.... that 11 of the <br />fields had deep percolation of less than 5 inches, three fields had <br />between 5 and 10 inches deep percolation and eight fields had over <br />10. inches of deep percolation. - The median deep percolation is <br />about 9.9 inches. <br /> <br />sites 26/51, 56, and 61 had 10.... deep percolation losses because of <br />under-irrigation after the first irrigation of the season., <br />However, actual field moisture determination witn.the hand feel <br />method at sites 26/51 and 61 during the irrigation season showed <br /> <br />'! <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />......:;.. <br />~:.~~?51 I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~:~\;~. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />