My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10689
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10689
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:18 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:27:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.600
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USDA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1994
Author
USDA
Title
Grand Valley Salinity Project - 1993 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.,'.;' :~ <br />{t~}1 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />en. <br />CJl <br /> <br />':;;'::":~ <br />,~; .,::;" <br /> <br />;"::". <br />':';';,., -'~ <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />2. Over-irrigation seems to have been a common practice in <br />fields that were monitored because of abundant supply of <br />inexpensive irrigation water. In 1993, about one-half of <br />the farmers practiced a high degree of irrigation water <br />management (IWM). <br /> <br />3. Poor irrigation efficiencies at some sites are due to over <br />irrigation, i.e. fields are irrigated too soon and too <br />long. All.of the monitored surface irrigation systems are <br />capable of irrigating at 50% or greater efficiency with <br />.:proper management. <br /> <br />4 During pre-irrigation of annual crops and first irrigation <br />of perennial crops for stand establishment (e.g. alfalfa), <br />many farmers in the Grand Valley apply a large amount of <br />water to "black over" the soil so that seeds have adequate <br />moisture for germination and establishment. The <br />elimination of this practice would reduce deep percolation <br />substantially (see 16). However, farmer accepted <br />alternative cultural or management practice'would pe.needed <br />to ensure stand establishment. Farmers are reluctant to <br />accept.practices which are not economically beneficial. <br /> <br />5. Excess pre-irrigation, or the first irrigation, is the <br />biggest contributor to seasonal deep percolation losses. <br />This is directly related to high infiltration rate during <br />these irrigations, which subsequently decreases after .the <br />first irrigation. This'is supported by the "advance.time" <br />data obtained from some of the monitored sites. When. <br />infiltration is high, it take~ longer for water to reach <br />the end of the furrow. The "advance time" is less during <br />later irrigations because of the decrease in infiltration <br />rate due to sealing of the soil surface. . <br /> <br />I <br />6. The 1993 data for surface irrigated monitored sites . <br />indicate that, on the average, about 20% of the seasonal <br />.deep percolation losses occurred during the first . <br />irrigation event and about 31% by the end of second . <br />irrigation. For annual crops (small grain and corn), 23% <br />of deep percolation occurred during the first irrigation <br />and about 33% by the completion of the second irrigation. <br /> <br />. <br />7. The 1993 data also shows that surface irrigated perennial <br />crop sites had 2.4 inches less deep percolation than annual <br />crops. Deep percolation for perennial crops fluctuated <br />throughout the season, due to changes in infiltration rates <br />and scheduling. Among annual crops, the deep perCOlation <br />decreased subtantially from the first to the second <br />irrigation event, stayed uniform for three to four <br />irrigations, and then decreased towards the end of the <br />irrigation season. 1 <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.