My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10670
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10670
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:27:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20 A
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations - States Forum (CRBSF) - Colorado River Board Of California
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/3/1954
Author
Douglas McKay
Title
Address by Secretary of the Interior Douglas McKay before the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />uU\JJ8~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />and the Yampa River, a tribut!U'y of the Colorado. While it wHl therefore alter <br /> <br />the canyon, we do not believe that it will destroy its scenic beauty. The known <br /> <br />dejXJsits of dinosaur remains will remain lUltouched--m:i.lcs from the reservoir site. <br /> <br />The Echo Park Dam site was personally inspected by Under Secreta!)" Ralph Tudor <br /> <br />together with Commissioner of Reclamation ~la A. Dexhei!ner and National Park Direc- <br /> <br />tor Conrad L. Hirth. After they returned, the Under Secretary reported to me that <br /> <br />whj~e there were other alternate sites outside the park, their use ~ouJd mean II <br /> <br />great loss of water from evaporation. <br /> <br />In the deep cWlyons in Ecto Park there will be II minimum of evap)ra~ion. The <br /> <br />storage area that would be provided byalter!late sites ~lot11d be sha1lo~1 and the <br /> <br />evaporation naturally greater. <br /> <br />Secretary Tudor reached his concl'.lsions on the basts of sotmd engineering and <br /> <br />good logic. He said use of any of the alternate sites wouJd mean the loss of <br /> <br />enough ',mter to supply all the needs of a citj" of over 600,000 people. Can we <br /> <br />afford to Wf'.ste that much Hater? Could you here in California afford to lose that <br /> <br />much ~ater? <br /> <br />Let me quote from Hr. Tudor's report. "There "Iould be substantia.] loss in <br /> <br />electric generating capacity if anyone of the :lltel'nate sites were selected. <br /> <br />While this is a matter of economic importance! do not attach as much weight to it <br /> <br />as to the loss of water. The power loss could be replaced by steam power at some <br /> <br />increased cost. <br /> <br />"I share the concern of those who would preserve the beauties of the Dinosaur <br /> <br />National Monument in their present natural state. but as between a choice of alter- <br /> <br />ing the scenery, ~)ithout destroying it, in a basin which is and viII remain rich in <br /> <br />scenery, or the irreplaceable loss of enough uater to supply all the !leeds of a <br /> <br />city the size of Denver, I believe the conservation of the water in the interest of <br /> <br />the Nation is of greatest :mportancea" <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.