Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..., ~, ., " 9 <br />n"., W <br />,""../...01,....1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />for in Colorado and at least a portion of the remaining 21 % must come from <br />Colorado. Distributing the 21 % by drainage area is most likely inappropriate given <br />the climatic change which occurs in that vicinity. Based on no mDre than <br />professional judgement I would suspect that no more than 50,000 AF comes off of <br />the drainage areas within New Mexico above Archuleta. <br /> <br />b/ <br /> <br />From, "Navajo Indian IrrigatiDn Project, Water Delivery System and Operation and <br />Maintenance Status Report" for Fiscal 1990. The 1976-1985 total was 901,760 AF <br />for a 1()-year average of 90,176 AF since the project began. Maximum diversion was <br />171,000 AF in 1989. <br /> <br /> B. Below Navajo Dam (1971-85 annual flows in AF) <br /> USGS Animas River @ Cedar Hill, NM = 703,777 <br /> USGS La Plata River @ Stateline = 31,898 <br /> USGS Mancos near Towaoc = 43,958 <br /> USGS McElmo (@ Stateline = 37.647 <br />e Subtotal = 817,280 <br /> C. Total Colorado Gaged Flow Above = 1,813,862 <br /> and Below Navajo (1971-85) <br /> USGS San Juan at Bluff, Utah (1971-85) = 1,716,907 <br /> Loss or difference between inflows = 96,955 <br /> to New Mexico and Bluff gage <br /> D. USBR Natural Flow San Juan near Bluff = 2,143,267 <br /> (1971-85) <br /> .. Colorado Consumptive Us~ (1971-85) = 76,187 <br /> New Mexico Consumptive Use (1971-85) = 313,053 <br /> Utah Consumptive Use (1971-85) = 56,780 <br /> Arizona Consumptive Use (1971-85) = 30.500 <br />e 1,666,747 <br /> <br />.. L~. _ __C_. _,__,__.__.__, <br /> <br />-,- <br />