My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10622
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:25:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/15/1960
Author
Engineering Comm.
Title
Revenue Requirements of Colorado River Storage Project Transmission System
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />taxes. Applying this percentage to the $8 million wheeling revenues gives a <br />total tax figure of only about $1.76 million annually, or roughly $176 million <br />for the 100-year period being studied. <br />It should come as no surprise to find that this last figure is quite con- <br />sistent with earlier conclusions above. For example. if wheeling revenues are <br /> <br />so low as to develop no income taxable by the federal government -- a possibil- <br /> <br />ity shown above the utilities' $4 million figure would drop to less than <br />$2 million. If we take the second and almost unconceivable position that only <br />$66 million in utility investment is actually devoted to wheeling service <br />even though normal fixed charges are earned -- the same order of figure for <br /> <br />taxes can be obtained. It can thus be concluded the utilities' claims as to <br /> <br />taxes are quite unrealistic. <br /> <br />For the privilege, then. of paying less than $2 million of taxes through <br />power revenues instead of other means, consumers would be asked to pay a,bout <br /> <br />$5 million more for power. The advantages of the all-federal system thus far <br /> <br />outweight those of the combination system even when tax differences are con- <br /> <br />sidered. <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL REVENUE BENEFITS WITH ALL-FEDERAL SYSTEM <br /> <br /> <br />In any transmission system built for the Storage Project, there will be <br /> <br /> <br />times when there is excess capacity for the interchange of energy. There will <br /> <br /> <br />be opportunities, especially in the more distant future, for the seasonal <br /> <br />interchange of capacity and for wheeling firm power in addition to Storage <br /> <br />Project output. And, also, there will be displacements of power over such <br /> <br />a giant power grid, which will result in economies not only for the Storage <br /> <br />Project but for all systems which its transmission lines interconnect. <br /> <br />Any or all of these other uses for this transmission system are bases for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.