My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10613
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:25:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.30
Description
UCRBRIP - Green River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/26/1991
Author
USDOI/FWS
Title
Habitat Use and Streamflow Needs of Rare and Endangered Fishes in the Green River, Utah
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(including lower flows) or other conditions (e.g. temperature and fish <br />movements) which may favor growth and reproduction of channel catfish in the <br />Green River basin should be further evaluated. <br /> <br />Bony tail Chub <br /> <br />Habitat requirements of the bony tail chub in the Green River basin are <br />little known. Fish collections in Echo Park (DNM) before and after closure of <br />Flaming Gorge Dam indicated that the species was present in moderate numbers <br />at the confluence of Yampa and Green rivers (Vanicek 1967). However, more <br />recent investigations in that area have yielded few captures. Holden and <br />Stalnaker (1975) reported the capture of 36 bony tail chubs in Yampa (lower 16 <br />km) and upper Green rivers from 1968 to 1970. Holden and Crist (1981) <br />collected one bony tail chub in the lower Yampa River in 1979, and USFWS <br />biolo9ists captured one suspected juvenile in 1987. Preliminary results of a <br />radiotracking study of adult bony tail chub introduced into the upper Green <br />River in 1988 and 1989 indicate that the fish exhibit crepuscular movements, <br />and are relatively quiescent durin9 the day and night (S. Cranney, Utah <br />Division of Wildlife Resources, pers. comm.). <br /> <br />Bony tail chub have apparently declined in the Echo Park area, possibly <br />due to habitat changes resulting from closure of Flaming Gorge Dam. These <br />changes included alteration of flow and temperature patterns, and also a <br />reduction in the number of macroinvertebrate taxa (Pearson 1967), i.e., the <br />food base. A similar pattern has been noted in the Colorado River downstream <br />from Glen Canyon Dam (Utah State Department Fish and Game 1964, 1969). <br />Although the preimpoundment poisoning of riverine habitat in the upper Green <br />River in 1962 has been implicated in the decline of the bony tail chub in that <br />system, fish collections in DNM before and after the poisoning (Binns et al. <br />1963; Vanicek and Kramer 1969; Vanicek et al. 1970) suggested that the <br />downstream extent of the poison was not the only factor in the extirpation of <br />the species from the Echo Park area. Flaming Gorge Dam operations could affect <br />the future of bony tail chub re-introductions in the Green River system, and <br />these operations must be considered in future reintroduction efforts. <br /> <br />Razorback Sucker <br /> <br />Adult razorback suckers have been predominantly captured in the upper <br />Green River (km 282 - 552) and in the lower 21 km of the Yampa River (Azevedo <br />1962; Vanicek et al. 1970; Holden and Stalnaker 1975; Seethaler et al. 1979; <br />HcAda and Wydowski 1980; Miller et al. 1982a; Tyus et al. 1982b; Tyus 1987; <br />Tyus and Karp 1990). Catch-effort estimates indicate that adult razorback <br />suckers are more rare than other native suckers and the endangered Colorado <br />squawfish (Table 1). <br /> <br />Radiotagged razorback suckers overwintered in the Jensen, and Island and <br />Echo parks reaches of Green River (McAda and Wydowski 1980; Valdez and <br />Hasslich 1989). In winter, razorback suckers used slow runs, slackwaters, <br />eddies and backwaters in the Green River, where local movements increased <br />with increased discharge and flow fluctuations (Valdez and Masslich 1989). <br />Razorback suckers have been observed using large backwaters in the Ouray area <br />of the Green River during early spring (HHT). <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.