Laserfiche WebLink
<br />003091 <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />PAGE 2 <br /> <br />HOPE AND OTHERS DO SO OUT OF FEAR, BUT MOST TAKE THESE AS CODE FOR <br />COMPLETELY REWRITING COLORADO WATER LAW. SO I WANT TO BE ABSOLUTELY <br />CLEAR ABOUT MY USAGE OF THESE TERMS. WHEN FROM TIME TO TIME I REFER <br />TO HATER PLANNING OR POLICY, I AM NOT PROPOSING WE CHANGE THE <br />FUNDAMENTAL MARKET ORIENTATION OF THE SYSTEM. <br /> <br />WHILE THE SYSTEM IS FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND, IT DOES NOT ALWAYS WORK <br />HELL AND IT DOES NOT ALWAYS REFLECT OUR COLLECTIVE VALUES. THERE <br />ARE DEFICIENCIES. AS THE RECENT TWO FORKS DEBATE CLEARLY SHOWED. <br />THEREFORE, I HOUlD LIKE FOR US TO FORMULATE AN AGENDA FOR ADDRESSING <br />THESE DEFICIENCIES. IN WHAT WE DO, I BELIEVE HE NEED TO BE GUIDED <br />BY AT lEAST THO IMPORTANT GOALS. <br /> <br />, 1. 'TO MAKE HATER CONSUMPTiON IN COLORADO AS EFFICIENT AS <br />POSSIBLE, AND <br /> <br />2. TO MAKE OUR INSTITUTIONS BETTER REFLECT THE COMMON VALUES <br />AND INTERESTS OF COLORADANS, AND TO BRING STATE LAWS AND <br />REGULATIONS MORE INTO LINE WITH THESE VAWES AND <br />INTERESTS. <br /> <br />THE AGENDA I AM SUGGESTING HOULD ADDRESS THESE GENERAL GOALS. IT AS <br />A SPECIFIC. SIX-POINT AGENDA FOR COLORADO. SOME OF THESE POIN-:-S <br />MIGHT ENTAIL IMMEDIATE LEGISLATIVE ACTION. OTHERS HILL BE BETTER <br />LEFT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS RATHER THAN THE STATE TO HORK OUT. SOME <br />