My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10599
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:25:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8127.600
Description
Lower Arkansas River Commission - LARC
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
11/1/1991
Author
LARC
Title
Analysis of Selected Water Rights - Lower Arkansas River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~. <br />-, <br />N <br />~ <br />00 <br />'"' <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF WATER RIGHTS ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Catlin Shares Owned by DOW: <br />(See Table 1 and Figure 1) <br />1. DOW owns 2,097.8 shares out of 18,645 total shares. <br /> <br />2. The Catlin shares owned by DOW will have an average yield o~o_~per year of <br />consumptive use (1940. 1985). <br /> <br />3. Value of shares would be primarily for agricultural use since Catlin Canal Company's by- <br />laws prohibit transfer from Otero and Crowley Counties. <br /> <br />4. Catlin shares may be of more value if traded for other water rights such as Mt. Pisgah <br />Reservoir, Larkspur Ditch, or Ft. Lyon Canal shares. <br /> <br />Mt. Pisgah Reservoir: <br />(See Table 1 and Figure 2) <br />1. Capacity approximately 3,000 AF. <br /> <br />2. Long-term average release (change in storage) is 989 AF per year (1928-1990). <br /> <br />3. The yield if delivered to John Martin Reservoir would be reduced by at least 25 percent due <br />to transit losses. >.:t 85bAF" <br /> <br />4. The reservoir's spillway is under order to be ~nlarged to pass 50 percent of the PMP. <br />""'"~ (o.a...., 2.) ~"I( <br /> <br />5. The owners of Mt. Pisgah Reservoir (Catlin Canal 6n and Canon Hei hts Ditch Company <br />(1fT) are having a consulting engineer perform a incremental damage analysis to determine <br />if the present spillway may be adequate. <br /> <br />6. The value of the reservoir and surroundingQi'o DOW and DPOR must be determined. <br />'-X i.\o::J A-<.- 'PcM ~.J...t .".J-o-'\< ~.'t <br />7. The Town of Cripple Creek is extremely interested in purchasing Mt. Pisgah Reservoir and <br />may have made an offer. "tt~- 1t \ 1"1 i (I!\-t?~O.J... ~ 'l;,-~" <br /> <br />Larkspur Ditch: <br />(See Table 1 and Figure 3) <br />1. Transmountain diversion needing repair. <br /> <br />2. Long-term average diversion into Arkansas basin is 197 AF per year (1935-89). <br /> <br />3. Long-term average yield at Catlin Canal is 160 AF per year. <br /> <br />4. May be of more value to DOW as a supply for fish hatcheries such .as the new one at Pueblo <br />Reservoir. 6~ ~"-t "" ')0::>0 ,^"",-Ql ~~~ ~. k.....~ <br />4, ~ ~ Il'-'",-<. :5t::\l,s~ <br /> <br />bI\"1"l0L\NG. ".... Ai f~ ,.,., W~~ ~v--~ ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.