My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10597
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:48 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:25:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8410.350
Description
Platte River Basin - Basin Multistate Organizations - Missouri Basin IAC
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
12/14/1962
Author
Raphael J Moses
Title
Recodification of Colorado Water Laws
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0027j~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City of Denver. As reporter for the committee, we have been for- <br /> <br />tunate in having Donald Hamburg, a member of the staff of the <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board, who is both a lawyer and an <br /> <br />engineer. He has been most diligent, and has done a very great <br /> <br />deal of work. <br /> <br />We made some ground rules: Anything that a majority of the <br /> <br />committee approved would be incorporated into the draft, but the <br /> <br /> <br />minority did not thereby lose their rights to continue to complain, <br /> <br /> <br />lobby and speak against the majority rule and in favor of their <br /> <br /> <br />own position. This was necessary, as it early became apparent <br /> <br />that unanimous agreement on all matters would not permit the devel- <br /> <br />opment of anything. <br /> <br />Secondly, we agreed that we would be limited by nothing in <br /> <br />the present law in making suggestions. Everything, no matter how <br /> <br />wierd it might seem at first blush, was ruled out for considera- <br /> <br />tion, although we did recognize the practical difficulties in- <br /> <br />volved in making suggestions that required an amendment of the <br /> <br />State Constitution. <br /> <br />We agreed that we would not put anything in just to make it <br /> <br />easier to get it through the Legislature, nor would we omit any- <br /> <br />thing in this draft just because it was controversial. We decided <br /> <br /> <br />that that sort of editing would be for others better able to weigh <br /> <br /> <br />the advantages and disadvantages. We would just propose what we <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.