Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) <br /> <br />Chapter <br /> <br />Pal!e No. <br /> <br />2.4 <br /> <br />Environmental Impacts Associated with <br />Alternative 9 .............................. 2-70 <br />Evaluation of the Capability of Alternative 9 to <br />Meet Purpose and Need Requirements of the <br /> <br />Project ................................... 2-70 <br />Evaluation of the Technical and Economic Merits <br />of Alternative 9 ............................ 2-71 <br />2.3.2.10 Alternative 10 - No Action Alternative .....................2-72 <br />2.3.2.10.1 Environmental Impacts Associated with <br />Alternative 10 ............................. 2-72 <br />2.3.2.10.2 Evaluation of the Capability of Alternative 10 to <br />Meet the Purpose and Need Requirements of <br />the Project ................................ 2-73 <br />2.3.2.10.3 Evaluation of the Technical and Economic Merits <br />of Alternative 10 ........................... 2-73 <br />2.3.3 Summary of Strengths and Weakness of Each of the Alternatives ........2-74 <br />2.3.3.1 Alternative 1- Administration Proposal ....................2-74 <br />2.3.3.2 Alternative 2 - Administration Proposal with Recreation Element <br /> <br />Added. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-74 <br />2.3.3.3 Alternative 3 - Administration Proposal with San Juan River Basin <br />Recovery Implementation Program Element Added ........... 2-75 <br />2.3.3.4 Alternative 4 - Administration Proposal with San Juan River <br />Basin Recovery Implementation Program and Recreation <br />Element Added . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-75 <br />Alternative 5 - Animas-La Plata Reconciliation Plan .......... 2-76 <br />Alternative 6 - Animas River Citizen's Coalition Conceptual <br />Alternative ...........................................2-76 <br />2.3.3.7 Alternative 7 - 1996 Final Supplement to the Final Environmental <br />Statement Recommended Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-77 <br />2.3.3.8 Alternative 8 - Administration Proposal with an Alternative Water <br />Supply for Non-Colorado Ute Indian Entities ................ 2-77 <br />2.3.3.9 Alternative 9 - Citizens' Progressive Alliance Alternative ...... 2-78 <br />2.3.3.10 Alternative 10 - No Action Alternative... .. . .... .. . .. .... ..2-78 <br />2.3.4 Summary of Alternatives Evaluation and Selection of Alternatives for Further <br />Refinement and Study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-78 <br />2.3.4.1 Environmental Impact Summary .......................... 2-79 <br />2.3.4.2 Purpose and Need Summary ............................. 2-79 <br />2.3.4.3 Technical and Economic Sununary ........................ 2-85 <br />2.3.4.4 Selection of Alternatives for Further Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-85 <br />2.3 .4.4.1 Refinernents to Alternative 4 and Alternative 6 ... 2-89 <br />COMPONENTS OF THE ALTERNATNES CONSIDERED BUT ELIMINATED <br />FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION IN THIS DSEIS ..................... 2-89 <br />2.4.1 Non-Structural Components Eliminated As Part of Alternatives I, 2, 3, 4, <br /> <br />6, 8 and 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-89 <br />2.4.1.1 Water Conservation Through Irrigation System Improvernent ... 2-90 <br />2.4.1.2 Raising ofVallecito and McPhee Dams... . ...... ., . . .. .....2-90 <br />2.4.1.3 Availability of Unused Water in McPhee Reservoir.. ., .......2-90 <br />2.4.2 Structural Components Eliminated ................................ 2-91 <br />2.4.2.1 Howardsville Dam Site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-91 <br /> <br />2.3.2.9.3 <br /> <br />2.3.2.9.4 <br /> <br />2.3.2.9.5 <br /> <br />2.3.3.5 <br />2.3.3.6 <br /> <br />IV <br />