Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'4Gi~ <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Montgomery Watson and Black and Veatch were contracted to conduct technical and <br />environmental studies to provide data on six selected alternative water storage projects which <br />will provide 173,100 acre feet of new water storage for Colorado Springs Utilities and the <br />Southern Colorado Water Conservancy District. Alternative selection is to take social, <br />environmental, and cultural variables into account. Montgomery Watson subcontracted Pioneer <br />Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (PAC) of Longmont, Colorado to gather and synthesize known <br />cultural resource data within six study areas involved in the six alternative projects and to assess <br />each alternative from the standpoint of impacts to cultural resources. <br /> <br />The six alternatives included the Fry-Ark Re-Operation, the Pueblo Reservoir Enlargement, the <br />Turquoise Reservoir Enlargement, the Lake Meredith Enlargement, Gravel Lakes Storage, and <br />Williams Creek Reservoir. It is likely that two or more of the above alternatives will be <br />combined to meet the overall storage needs. No physical changes will be required to implement <br />the Fry-Ark Re-Operation alternative. Reservoir enlargement will increase dam height for Pueblo <br />Reservoir (5-10 feet; 25,000 -75,000 acre feet of storage), Turquoise Lake (5-11 feet; increase <br />10,000-20,000 acre feet of storage), or Lake Meredith (II feet; 75,000 acre feet of storage). The <br />Gravel Lakes alternative involves the conversion of sand and gravel pits along the Arkansas <br />River near Pueblo to water storage facilities holding approximately 13,000 acre feet of water. <br />Another alternative is the construction of a dam on Williams Creek in southern El Paso County <br />to form a 30,000 acre foot reservoir. The six study areas included in these project alternatives <br />are Lake Meredith in Crowley County, Turquoise Lake and Twin Lakes in Lake County, Pueblo <br />Reservoir and Gravel Lakes sites in Pueblo County, and a site along Williams Creek in south- <br />central EI Paso County. <br /> <br />Records examined during the study included the site files of the Office of Archaeology and <br />Historic Preservation at the Colorado Historical Society, the Pike-San Isabel Office of the U.S. <br />Forest Service, and the Eastern Plains Area Office of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Data <br />concerning irrigation ditches within the study area was obtained principally from the Colorado <br />Division Water Resources, Division 2, Water Districts 12, 14, 15, and 17 and from a number of <br />people directly involved with the various ditches. Libraries consulted for information on <br />irrigation ditches and the Arkansas Valley Conduit include the Pueblo Chieftain Archives, the <br />Western History Department of the Pueblo Library. and the Local History Section of the Pikes <br />Peak Public Library. Will Tully of the Eastern Colorado Area Office of the Bureau of <br />Reclamation was contacted for information concerning cultural resources studies of Pueblo <br />Reservoir, Twin Lakes and Turquoise Lake. He also provided information on the Fryingpan- <br />Arkansas Project. Research was conducted at the Pike-San Isabel National Forest Office in <br />Pueblo concerning sites under their jurisdiction around Twin Lakes and Turquoise Lake. <br /> <br />The PAC study identified all recorded cultural resources located within the six study areas, <br />identified some presently unrecorded and unevaluated irrigation ditches known to exist or have <br />existed in the study areas, and identified areas that have been subjected to intensive cultural <br />resource inventories. The National Register status of evaluated sites was discussed. Finally, each <br />water storage alternative was evaluated in terms of its impact to cultural resources. Variables <br /> <br /><lID <br /> <br />Cultural Issues <br /> <br />_. <br />