My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10584
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:43 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:24:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.910
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - Granada Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/1/1961
Author
Bureau of Reclamatio
Title
Status and Inventory Report - Granada Project and Arkansas River Basin Below John Martin Reservoir - Colorado and Kansas
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />31 <br /> <br /> <br />0046 <br /> <br />storage and regulation could be provided in the authorized Cheney <br /> <br />Reservoir. This system could divert an average ~nual supply of <br />about 18,000 acre-feet from Syracuse Reservoir plus a portion of <br /> <br />the 21,000 acre-feet of unregulated inflow occurring between Garden <br /> <br />City and Dodge City. <br /> <br />An alternate diversion route could leave the Arkansas River <br /> <br />about eleven miles below Lamed. A canal about 45 miles long would <br /> <br />convey the water in a southeasterly direction across the Rattlesnake <br /> <br />drainage to discharge into a tributary of the North Fork of the <br /> <br />Ninnescah River just south of Stafford. This plan could divert the <br /> <br />releases from Syracuse Reservoir plus a part of the average annual <br /> <br />unregulated inflow of 153,000 acre-feet between Garden City and Larned. <br />This inflow includes 104,000 acre-feet from Pawnee River which enters <br /> <br />the Arkansas at Larned. This diversion route traverses a rather <br /> <br />extensive oil field and the danger of pollution might be high. <br />1 <br /> <br />A second aJ.ternate i'outecould divert from the Arkansas River <br /> <br />about 3 miles below Great Bend. A canal about 44 miles long would <br /> <br />flow in a southeasterly direction across the Rattlesnake drainage to <br /> <br />the North Fork of the Ninnescah River near the town of Sylvia. This <br /> <br />plan would have available the releases from Syracuse Reservoir plus <br /> <br />part of the unregulated average annual inflow of 203,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />between Garden City and Great Bend. This inflow includes Walnut <br /> <br />Creek. This route could aJ.so be subjected to serious pollution from <br /> <br />the oil fields and salt marshes which would be traversed. <br /> <br />Regulation of the Pawnee River and Walnut Creek flows would <br /> <br />materially enhance the two latter plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.