Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r, ' , 'J ')'1 <br />Ij u tJ"" O. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Full-scale cloud seeding operations in the prime target areas are <br />estimated to cost $2,650,000 annually, This estimate includes <br />amortizal1on of the capital cost of the hardware and the operation, <br />maintenance, and replacement costs, as we]] as a continuing <br />analysis of results and any effects on ecological regimes, Based <br />on these estimates the unit cost of producing 1,900.000 acre-feet <br />of new water by cloud seeding would be $1. 50 per acre-foot. <br /> <br />The regional research and development effort for the Upper Basin will <br />be our first such undertaking in weather modification, The knowledge <br />gained here will be beneficial for similar projects elsewhere. <br /> <br />Assuming that the predicted yield is realized, a major question would <br />undoubtedly arise, That is would the additional water developed by <br />cloud seeding be considered augmentation water in fulfillment of the <br />Mexican Treaty obligation or would it be claimed by the Upper Basin <br />in fulfillment of its 7,5 million acre-feet allotted by the Colorado <br />River Compact but unavailable to the Upper Basin by reason of the <br />Upper Basin's obligation to not deplete the runoff at Lee Ferry below <br />75,000,000 acre-feet each consecutive ten year period? <br /> <br />Potential Surface Water Imports from California -- Two potentials exist <br />for augmenting the Colorado River by importing surplus surface water <br />from California streams, First, in average and above average years <br />the Central Valley produces a great deal of water that is surplus to its <br />needs, By diverting this excess water to off-channel hold over storage <br />reservoirs and pumping it into the Colorado River basin it could be used <br />for augmentation, This potential has not been studied but it is expected <br />that costs would be high, <br /> <br />The second potential would entail controlling surplus runoff of North <br />Coast streams for transbasin diversion to the Colorado, Limited study <br />has been made of this potential which indicates that its costs also <br />would be high, and further, that California eventually will need this <br />water for its internal use, <br /> <br />Further consideration will be given to both of these potentials, <br /> <br />Water Salvage Measures -- Much has already been accomplished to <br />salvage water and prevent waste through channelization, canal lining, <br />water shed treatment, construction of Senator Wash regulating reservoir, <br />and other means, Additional salvage and waste prevention can be attained <br />through eradication and control of phreatophytes, ground-water recovery, <br />municipal waste water capture and treatment, evaporation suppression, <br />further water shed treatment, further canal lining, and other means, Water <br />made available through salvage measures is usually relatively inexpensive, <br />Although water salvage is not the complete answer to augmentation, it <br />should and will be thoroughly considered to determine the extent to which <br />it can contribute to the total water needs, <br /> <br />- 7 - <br />