Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />3 <br />at the ti~e of said notice, the aggregate of such appropriations <br />in either Basin shall exceed those in the other there is hereby <br />vested and established inthut Basin having the lesser amount a <br />continuing and preferential right to make further appropriations <br />until the totals in each of the Basins shall be equal. The un- <br />appropriated surplus of waters then remaining above: 15,000.000 <br />acre feet per annum shall be equitably apportioned under Article IV." <br />Judge Sloan raised the point last evening that in case of <br />failure of apportionment by the Commission teere should be a right <br />to go to the court for such apportionment and thnt this clause <br />would need a continuation or some other point effectively in the <br />compact that would carry that out. Was not that the sense of <br />that, JUdge? <br />JUDGE SLOAN: Yes, to guard against the contingency that the <br />one division may be 'indifferent, because there is no present need <br />for any reapportionment. <br />CHAIRMAN HOOVER: Did you have an opportunity to write anymore <br />than was sketched on my paper here? <br />JUDGE SLOAN: No, I didn't. <br />CHAIRMAN HOOVER: What do you think, Mr. Norviel? <br />MR. NORVIEL: We'll, the thing don't mean much to me.. I <br />don't understand it at all. ; <br />CHAIRMJ..N HOOVER: How would you express it, Mr., Nor,vi:el, to <br />comprise your idea? <br />MR. NORVIEL: I would want to know what we are driving at first. <br />I want to know where the water is to be divided, what the 7,500,000 <br />acre feet per annum mean, and the reason for the 7,500,000 acre <br />feet and if the 7,500,000 acre feet is to include the streams <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~, <br />