Laserfiche WebLink
<br />33 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />without doing injury. The development of the area is ,a progressive, <br />physical problem, and is manifest from the 'ground, and it is not <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />a fleeting ~hing. going by on,a gallop, 'as it were, like the flow <br /> <br />of the river. th~t once having passed no man can recheck, but the <br /> <br />amount of acreage irrigated can be ascertained even if one engineer <br /> <br />fail during his term, the succeeding state engineer can ascertain <br /> <br />the aocurate acreage, and other like facts, but the only ellusive <br /> <br />prOblem in this whole work of these engineers is the flow of the <br /> <br />river. <br /> <br />CHliIRMl,N HOOVER: We 11, now, don t t we get at it by simply <br /> <br />saying: "Promote the systematic determination and coordination <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />of the facts as to flow, appropriation, consumption and use of <br />water,~n the Colorado River Basin~" There is nothing m~ndBtbry <br />about that. Doesn't <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CALDWELL: I would be able to agree,on ,this outside of <br />the fact it is going to be in the p~ct, I think your suggestion <br /> <br />is the best we can do. <br /> <br />JUDGE SLOAN: Is the obJection to putting it in ,the pact that <br />it m.igl1tpos'sibly be construed as a hrench of the pact in cnse of <br />the failure of some official. <br />MR. CAIDWELL: My objection is that some statesmen ,up our' <br /> <br />, ' <br /> <br />way might argue that it would bring about a breach of the pact' <br /> <br />fa <br /> <br />and get L)s i,nto an altercation in ~he legislature over, what. I ' <br /> <br />consider a trifling matter compared with the main object of the <br /> <br />pact. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />CBl,IRMb.N HOOVER: All I would like to see in here i,s somEl- <br />thing that will indicate that there, should be a collection of <br /> <br />this data because when we get to t,l1e longpericids described in <br />