My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10568
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:24:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/19/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #19
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />31 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />those ratings thus checked would form the basis of your permanent <br /> <br />'rat ing. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN HOOVE~: Do you think this original expression <br />obta'ined that all right:, I'Secur-e the determination 'and publioation <br /> <br />of the annual flow of water in the Colorado River.System or else- <br /> <br />where. u, <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: Off hand it seems to me to be suffi.ciently <br /> <br />broad. <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN HOOVER: , I ,think it covers that point,. <br />MR. c'b.RPENTER: Mr. Caldwell's suggestion, I take it; is <br /> <br />directed to this thought.1l.sto the ratings at Lee Ferry, there <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />should be some mandatory, p:rovision, - directory article. That. is <br /> <br />imperative to all of us. With respect to the remainder) that. <br /> <br />'It <br /> <br />should not be so mandatory ~hat n breach or failure of any onB <br />official to properly function in that respect could be set up as <br />a ground of breach. It is e(lsy to anticipate that many ,state <br /> <br />engineers coming now into the fieidby reason of their, rec~nt <br /> <br />- <br />appointment, might overlook one Summer's work in this respect. <br /> <br />The states as such should not be held to a breach. <br /> <br />JUDGE SLOAN: Why shouldn't a state that should have failed <br /> <br />in that be considered as having breached the contract, without of <br />course the' penalty of having the compact rescinded. <br />MR.Cl."RPENTER: I don't mean that statement to apply to the <br /> <br />rating of the river. I mean as to a gathering of data. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />JUDGE SLOb.N: That is a very important feature, isn't it, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the gathering of data? <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: Well, the gathering of data will naturally <br /> <br />have to fit in largely to the other work of the state engineer's <br /> <br />~" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.