My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10568
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:24:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/19/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #19
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />29 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />divisions that those facts be ascertained with all reasonably <br /> <br />accuracy annually and that they be published and declared. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />MR. CbLDWELL: To what effect, Mr. Carpenter? If they are <br /> <br />published and declared are we bound particularly to those measure- <br /> <br />ments by this pact? <br /> <br />MIL Cl,x(PENTER: I think you would be. <br />GH1,IHM1,N HOOVEH: I think so. I think the whole pact revolves <br /> <br />upon that determination. <br /> <br />1m. Cl,LDWELL: Then we are setting up machinery here to which <br /> <br />we are bound. <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN HOOVER: Weli, you are bound to deliver a certain <br /> <br />amount of watter, and you must have the water measured. <br /> <br /><to <br /> <br />, ' , <br />MR. CALDWELL: That is, the fact that we are to deliver the <br /> <br />water I think should be in the pact and outside of the pact we <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />should set up the machinery, which I am very willing to agree to. <br /> <br />I think we should do it. <br /> <br />... - <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: What prompted the thought was that the state <br /> <br />official having charge of the water administration and measurement <br /> <br />of streams within his state was the natural and logical repres- <br /> <br />entative of that state every year in the future for the purpose of <br /> <br />, , <br />determining the facts respecting the tee Ferry flow. Now they <br />may c'oncurrently delegate, and should have the 'right to delegate, <br /> <br />the principal duty of making the measurements in some institution - <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, , <br />. . , . ' . <br />say the Geological Survey - but each state engineer should have <br />sufficient control that he may make as many check ratings and <br />other proofs of that official rating, or that rating made by the <br />one they s'elect', as may be necessary in order to assure him that <br />those measurements are correct and 'if dispute arises between the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />iL. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.