Laserfiche WebLink
<br />25 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />case where there are two states that get together and say "we <br />will pa~s this act if you will pass the other act." <br />MR. MC KISICK: In that event wouldn't the expression "direct <br />legislative action" cover it? <br />MR. Cl,RPENTER: I adopted the word "direct" as an attempt to <br />cover both single and reciprocal. <br />,MR. Dl,VIS: You could cut out the word "direct". and have the <br />same results accomplished by legislative action. <br />JUDGE SLOAN: Of course it wouldn't do in a dispute,- I mean <br />it wouldn't be any settlement if action were taken by one legisla- <br />ture of one state without some corresponding recognition of that <br />basis of settlement by the'other unless it were a concession which <br />covered the ground of the case. <br />MR. CARPENTER: You may strike the word "direct" out. <br />MR. Me KISICK: I should think it would want to contain it <br />for the reason it distinguishes between this clllSS of cases and <br />the other class of cases whereby legislqtive action i.s to follow <br />adjustment by commissioners. <br />MR. EMhRSON: Under the present wording there would that <br />refer to existing legislation as well as any that may be,entered <br />into hereafter? <br />MR. DAVIS: I would say it wbuld not affeot it one way or <br />the other, Mr~"Emerson. We are protecting the future. We are <br />saying nothing as to the present. <br />MR. EMERSON: Certain prooesses are now set up. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. DAVIS: They continue. <br /> <br />JUDGE SLOl,N: Mr. Emerson, if those m,atterscan be taken care <br /> <br />of undElr existing law there could scarcely be se,t up any occasion <br /> <br />:'--' <br />