Laserfiche WebLink
<br />80 <br /> <br />whntever term you may ngree upon, but a definite tlme limit should <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />be put in it. <br />CHb.IRML~N HOOVER: If you go into that detail don'''t; you go <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />into the date of setting the time as to when this meeting is to <br /> <br /> <br />occur and how quickly it has to get a decision, then you 'go <br /> <br />through a long mill of provisions. <br /> <br />MR. Db.VIS: If you make it mandatqry upon a Governor to do <br />it, it means he shall dolt within a reaqon~ble time. <br /> <br />JUDGE SLO[~N:Why not add the words II shall without delay." <br /> <br />CHhIRM[~ HOOVER: ,I think that would help. <br /> <br />MR. MC KISICK: "Forthwith" is a good word, isn't it~ <br /> <br />',1 <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />. <br />CHAIRM[~N HOOVER: It means the same thing. <br />MR; NORVIEL: "Forthwith" should follow the 'Word "shall." <br /> <br />-Il <br /> <br />MR. MC KISICK: You have got a long parenthetical phrase, in <br />there. <br />MR. NORVIEL: "The Governors of the 'States affected, shall, <br /> <br /><to <br /> <br />uPOD'request of the ,Governor 'of one such; state, forthwith apPoint." <br />MR.D1.VIS: We can settle' that controver$yby putting a <br />, . <br /> <br />comma after the word "affected," and putting the wor~ Dshall" <br />after the word "state." <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: Put I'shall forthwith". before the word "appoint. II <br /> <br />CH1.IRML~ HOOVER: Is there any further suggestion on that <br /> <br />paragraph? <br />MR.D1~VIS: The title isn't clear. '''[~rbitr;ation'' 1'mplles the, <br />calling in of 0. third party, does it not? I thlnk the tit Ie <br />would perhaps ''better be "o.djustment of controyersieslt 6r sOr.Jething <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />of tho.t sort. <br /> <br />',j. <br /> <br />CHI,I RMl.N HOOVER: <br /> <br />I thlnk that is a bettE?rsuggestion. <br />