My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10568
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:24:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/19/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #19
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />would: be satisfactory to him to take the place of this paragraph <br />which is marked (a) under Article III, so that we may know exactly <br />what he would agree to? <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: It seems to me, Mr. Chairman, that the trquble <br />lies in the confusion of what in my m~nQ'are two rather distinct <br />factions. First, we have guaranteed a certain delivery of water <br /> <br />at Lee, Ferry. That amount of water agreed upon to be delivered <br /> <br />by the upper states takes care of the requir~ments of the lower <br /> <br />states" both past and those that ~re estimated for the future, <br /> <br />plus the Mexican burden. The other factor is the questi~n ?f the <br /> <br />relative development of the two drainagebas'ins. Now understand, <br /> <br />in that first factor of delivery at Lee Ferry there is allowance <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'* <br /> <br />for a Mexican burden. When it comes ,to the question of relative <br />development in the two basins the Mexican acreage ~oes not enter <br /> <br />into. the cbnsideration. <br /> <br />CHhIRMAN HOOVER: No. <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: And if Mr. Norviel can consider that proposition, <br />as a two, factor proposition and not tie up the amount of the <br />development in the two basins with the guaranty of delivery of <br />water at Lee' Ferry, it might help in ,finding a solution of the, <br />matter. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: Mr. Chairman, this question' of' guaranty has come <br /> <br /> <br />up often J.n this discussion. The guaranty ,which the upper states <br /> <br />. , . '.... <br />so magnanimously offer to us upon the suggestion of an even eHvision <br />of the water, has always., been less than that amount of water which <br />they say is our? In other ~ords, they say ~we will give you a <br />fifty-fifty divisioriof the water at Lee Perry and' thEm~e will <br />guaranty YOQ out of your half of the fifty-fifty division an <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.