Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dakota, Eastern Dakota, Platte-Niobrara, Middle Mis- <br />souri, Kansas, and Lower Missouri. There was no <br />corresponding subbasin or subregion designated. The <br />hydrologic and corresponding political delineations of <br />the basin are shown on plate I. <br />The eight subregions were further subdivided into 27 <br />smaller subareas. Again, these followed political bound- <br />aries, but approximated minor hydrologic drainage <br />systems. In addition, II Standard Metropolitan Statisti- <br />cal Areas (SMSA) in the region were broken out <br />separately and projections developed for them. Because <br />of their strategic economic importance in explaining <br />spatial economic growth and rationalizing projected <br />economic and population changes, separate treatment of <br />these larger urban areas was warranted. <br /> <br />ORGANIZATION OF THE APPENDIX <br /> <br />This appendix has been organized to give the reader a <br />chronological picture of the Missouri River Basin, <br />beginning with the relevant history and proceeding to <br />projections through the year 2020. As such, the first <br />chapter covers the background of the Comprehensive <br />Framework Plan and the events which precipitated the <br />study. The chapter also contains a discussion of the <br />objectives of comprehensive planning within the overall <br />national water resource planning framework. <br />Chapter 2 is devoted to a physical description of the <br />basin, the major historical events which helped to shape <br />the development of the basin's economy, and the <br />resource endowments of the basin. <br />In chapter 3, information on the region's economy <br />for the 1940-1960 period is presented. Detailed employ- <br />ment, income, earnings, and popu~a~io~~t~__'!.!e_gLv~n__ _ <br />'--fonhe-region-aiiCl--nscomponents, and analyses of the <br />region's historical development to the current period are <br />presented. While many elements of an economic base <br />study are contained in this chapter and the one <br />following, the appendix lacks sufficient production data <br />and information on structural interdependencies of the <br />economy to qualify it as a complete economic base <br />study. However, the historic base and the projections are <br />sufficient to provide a projected framework for water <br />and related land resource planning in the basin. The final <br />section of this chapter contains brief summaries of the <br />physical, demographic and economic characteristics of <br />the eight subregions. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Chapter 4 discusses the projected economy of the <br />region for the three target years, 1980, 2000, and 2020. <br />The format and content of the chapter are similar to <br />those of the previous chapter. Detailed economic and <br />population projections for the target years are presented <br />for the Nation and for all geographic units identified in <br />the region. <br />Chapter 5 was written following the development of <br />the Comprehensive Framework Plan by the Resource <br />Development Work Group. A generalized plan indicating <br />the level of new water investments was made relating to <br />projected needs. These investments were identified by <br />subbasin. The Economic Work Group then assessed the <br />changes in earlier projected parameters that wOuld be <br />expected to occur as a result of such investments. This <br />chapter is intended to reflect the relative impact that <br />certain water resource developments will have upon the <br />region's projected economy. <br /> <br />Chapter 6 describes the methodology used in the <br />development of the various projections. The national <br />projection model is first presented, followed by state- <br />ments on procedures followed in disaggregating employ- <br />ment and population to smaller geographic and <br />industrial levels. The last two sections are concerned <br />with procedures for projecting national demands for <br />agricultural and minerals production, employment, and <br />population related to these levels, and the disaggregation <br />of these to regional and subregion levels. <br /> <br />The appendix concludes with a Statistical Supple- <br />ment on population, employment, and income; agricul- <br />ture; timber resources; mineral resources; and <br />supplemental projections. After the plan for water and <br />related land .resources was fOf the -most part completed, <br />in January 1969 the Water Resources Council ,'lent <br />revised demographic and economic projections re- <br />questing the new projections be evaluated. The revised <br />projections were deemed necessary primarily due to <br />lower estimates of population growth, revised rates of <br />productivity, and other criteria described in the Supple- <br />ment. Because of the advanced status of the framework <br />study at the time the new projections were received, the <br />Missouri Basin Inter-Agency Committee deemed it in- <br />advisable to interrupt the study. Therefore the supple- <br />ment notes the differences between the original and <br />revised projections and the general implications this <br />might have on the plan as it was devised. <br />