Laserfiche WebLink
<br />! <br /> <br />.!("~ <br />"..I l..- <br /> <br />.,.,.. <br />l'i..\). <br />i~ <br />l- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />.'. <br /> <br />, ~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />E. Saying, "similar to historical conditions", is vague. Tell what the historical conditions are? <br />RESPONSE: We have followed your above suggestions and have expanded the definitions in both <br />the Executive Summary and in Chapter 8. <br /> <br />Idon't agree that maintaining a similar peak ofQ max timing to historical conditions will necessarily <br />yield ascending and descending hydrograph limbs similar 10 historic conditions. You can achieve <br />the date of Qmax by opening the gates completely for three days and then shutting them off which <br />results in steep ascending and descending hydrograph limbs, or your could increase and decrease <br />flows more gradually achieving the same date of Q max but with more gradual rising and falling <br />hydrograph limbs. I think, if you want a rate of hydrograph rise and fall lhen providing rate of <br />change of flow (e.g., + or - cfs/day) is what's needed (i.e. the ramp up and ramp down volumes ?). <br />RESPONSE: Since Navajo Dam only controls about 50% of the flow in the area of concern, the <br />nature of the release shape is influenced both by release ramp rates and timing of the peak. The <br />result of this recommendation must be taken in the context of the other recommendations being met. <br />Specifying the mean date and acceptable range of standard deviation is important to mimic the <br />historic timing of the ascending and descending limbs. The language has been edited to include this <br />qualification and make in clearer. <br /> <br />Chapter 1 <br />1.1. Correct use of fish versus fishes. RESPONSE: We have checked usage of these terms again <br />throughout the document. <br /> <br />1.4. Try and cite more primary literature. Richter et al. 1998 (Reg. Rivers 14:329-340) and other <br />papers of his cited therein are more credible than an abstract for an oral paper. Richter's papers <br />preach the natural flow regime in a very articulate and convincing manner. RESPONSE: We have <br />added better references per your suggestion. <br /> <br />Chapter 2 <br />2-26. "Production" was not either measured nor "estimated". Standing crop or biomass (gmlm') <br />was measured. Production is a rate, e.g. gmIm'/day. Equating standing crop to production is similar <br />to saying volume (cf) equals discharge (cfs). Call it biomass. RESPONSE: We have made this <br />change. <br /> <br />Chapter 3 <br />3.3. P. 4. Saying temperature "was less variable" than date of spawning is somewhat misleading, <br />particularly when you later say that photoperiod may be more important than temperature for cuing <br />spawning. Its comparing apples and oranges. Just say temperature varied from 16 to 19C. <br />RESPONSE: We have corrected this sentence to conform to the conclusions developed by Bestgen <br />et al. (1998). <br /> <br />3-16. 1'd be a bit careful in implying studies from Lake Mohave are applicable to a riverine system <br />without a word of caution. Research by Papoulias and Minckley (T AFS, 1989?) indicated starvation <br /> <br />Comments and Responses <br /> <br />Flow Recommendations Drah Report <br /> <br />Galat - 5 <br />