My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10539
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10539
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:23:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.31.B
Description
San Juan River - FWS Flow Recommendations
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
2/1/1999
Title
Response to Comments on the Flow Recommendations for the San Juan River Draft Report (December 4 1998)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> <br />., <br />,::10 <br />':'.'\..:") <br />ho, <br />,''i,n <br />.:c;-~ <br />~\ <br /> <br />.., <br />I <br /> <br />'.!- <br /> <br />. ~ <br /> <br />. .~~ <br /> <br />~, ;, <br /> <br />"?; <br /> <br />,'~ <br /> <br />Words to Consider Adding to Glossary <br />General: Very few of the technical hydrological terms used throughout the text are defined in the <br />Glossary relative to biological terms. <br /> <br />"Nose" Table 4.9, pg. 8-7 RESPONSE: We have replaced the use of this word in the text with <br />"early release." The following words have been added to the Glossary along with other <br />hydrological terms. <br /> <br />Roughness (Manning's n) <br /> <br />Habitat complexity (pg. 4-44) <br /> <br />Ramp up and ramp down (used throughout, but never defined) <br /> <br />Minimum peak release (pg.8-7) <br /> <br />Primary peak release (pg. 8-7) <br /> <br />Depletion base condition <br /> <br />Tables <br />81 and 6.1. That is the most important Table of the Report and must therefore be explicitly clear. <br /> <br />Change: Adult Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker prefer ,-,~e complex ri ver areas. Preference <br />requires demonstration that fish use exceeds availability of a particular area within the system. Text <br />doesn't indicate preference was determined. <br /> <br />Flow Requirement. <br /> <br />Number of spring runoff... (2 boxes).These sentences are unclear. What number of days? <br /> <br />Temperature flow requirement. This box should tell what is needed for fish, not what is wrong. <br />RESPONSE: Your proposed changes to Tables S.l and 6.1 have been made except that related to <br />temperature. Due to the location of intakes on Navajo Dam, the water cannot be warmed up to meet <br />historical temperatures but releases srill provide sufficient temperature for the endangered fishes <br />to spawn. <br /> <br />2.1. Why are there so many blanks for various terms? They should all be defined, no matter how <br />obvious (e.g. island) they may seem to us. Define "pocket water". Define "cutback", see next <br />comment. RESPONSE: This table has been revised to include definitions for all habitats. . <br /> <br />Comments and Responses <br /> <br />Flow Recommendations Draft Report <br /> <br />Galat- 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.