My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10471
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10471
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:05 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:20:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.900
Description
Platte River Basin-Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies-Bear Creek
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/1/1989
Author
CWCB
Title
Engineering Report for Storable Water by CWCBs Water Rights
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Mt. Vernon Creek flows are added to the flows at the Morrison Gage adjusted by Item <br />1a. For Morrison Gage virgin flows of less than 30 cfs, the Mt. Vernon Creek flows <br />are zero. Above 30 cfs, the Mt. Vernon creek flows are assumed to be equal to 2 <br />percent of the Morrison Gage virgin flows. <br /> <br />2. Return flows from diversions upstream of the Bear Creek Lake and downstream of the <br />Morrison Gage are assumed to be equal to zero. This assumption is reasonable since the <br />Harriman Ditch is now lined or in a pipeline, and there is very little irrigation above Bear <br />Creek Lake. It was agreed amongst the engineers that Turkey Creek inflows would be <br />considered zero, which is consistent with the assumptions for the Model. The Town of <br />Morrison diverts upstream ofthe Morrison Gage, but for this study it is assumed that it diverts <br />below the gage. Some return flows occur upstream of Bear Creek Lake as sewage effluent <br />discharged from Morrison's wastewater plant, which has been neglected in the Model. <br /> <br />3. Depletions from exempt wells upstream of the Morrison Gage are assumed to be zero. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Recharge from Bear Creek Lake to the Arapahoe or Laramie-Fox Hills aquifers are assumed <br />to be zero. A rise in some of the downstream Arapahoe wells after the permanent pool in <br />Bear Creek Lake was filled was obselVed. However, the USGS is no longer monitoring these <br />wells so that no official evidence of any further rise has been documented. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />All transfers of water rights in Bear Creek to new points of diversion and new uses are strictly <br />administered according to the decrees granted in Water Court. All of these water rights, as <br />well as other rights will be diverting the full amount granted by these decrees at all times when <br />in priority. <br /> <br />6. The State of Colorado's Simonton Ditch for 2.25 cfs is assumed to be in priority whenever <br />water is available at the Morrison Gage. This assumption allows greater diversions by the <br />State's Simonton Ditch than those shown on page 2, which may result in artificial shortages <br />to other Bear Creek Water rights, especially during dry periods. However, the difference in <br />the 2.25 cfs and that shown on page 2 does allow for a possible successful transfer of a small <br />portion of Denver's Simonton Ditch ownership. <br /> <br />7. Return flows will provide sufficient water to meet the McBroom Ditch demands at all times. <br /> <br />S9-026.00W <br /> <br />1956 <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.