Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. ..0.-'.....,.,..- <br />';...;.:.;.;.,<,:-x.'." <br />........~,'....'......'--.' <br />[g;:~?:X~~~!J~;~ <br /> <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />..........,.. <br />.......-......-........ <br />gtdiJff~ifi:?; <br />..........v_'.._.v..... . <br />{WPi~;~"J?S~, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />River Evaporation <br /> <br />A reservoir release causes an Increase In the surface area of a river <br />and, therefore, results In additional evaporation losses from the river. <br />Because earlier studies of transit loss had determined this evaporation loss <br />to be only about 6 percent of the total transit loss (Livingston, 1973), It <br />was not included in the original computer model. In contrast to the upstream <br />reach, the Arkansas River downstream from Pueblo is generally much broader <br />and slower moving, and traverses an area characterized by generally warmer <br />temperatures and frequent winds. For this reason, river evaporation was ex- <br />pected to be more significant in the study reach, and suitable modifications <br />to the model were required. <br /> <br />The basic steady-state flow equation is: <br /> <br />Q=AV=wDV, <br /> <br />(1) <br />(2) <br /> <br />or <br /> <br />W=Q!DV, <br /> <br />where: <br />Q=discharge, In cubic feet per second; <br />A=area, in square feet; <br />V=average velocity, in feet per second; <br />W=width, in feet; and <br />D=average depth, In feet. <br /> <br />Analysis of numerous <br />indicated a correlation <br />relationship Is: <br /> <br />discharge measurements made along the study reach <br />coefficient of 0.99 between Q and product DV. This <br /> <br />DV=O. 69+0. 0048Q. <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />Equation 2 can then be written as: <br /> <br />W=Q/(0.69+0.0048Q), <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />and used to estimate river width for any flow In the study reach. <br /> <br />The original computer model was modified to compute the change in river <br />evaporation losses resulting from a reservoir release, based on the increase <br />In average river width from equation 4, the river-mile length of the <br />subreach, and the average evaporation rate for the month the release is made. <br />To determine the average monthly evaporation rate, it was assumed that river <br />and lake evaporation are about the same in the study reach. The average lake <br />evaporation rate is 6.0 in. per month or 2.00xl0-7 ft/s during May through <br />October and 2.7 In. per month or 0.86xIO-7 ft/s during November through April <br />(U.S. Weather Bureau, 1959). <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />'.' : '.,' ~- - :,' ~. - ~ : -: -'~~ ::..:~~-;....:'~:::-.:~~':':-':~:-~~'.:~:-.~~~~"':;-?~~:;:::~~:::::::-::~ :';'.~': :':-~ -,' <br />