Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Beneficial Consumptive Uses <br /> <br />An extensive discussion of consumptive uses is treated in <br />detail in Reclamation's draft "Colorado River System <br />Consumptive Uses and Losses Report, 1981-1985," That <br />report was prepared jointly by the Upper and Lower <br />Colorado Regional Offices and was scheduled for release in <br />1988, but has not yet been published due to technical review <br />questions, The report presents estimates ofthe consumptive <br />uses and losses from the Colorado River System for each year <br />from 1981 through 1985. The table on the following page was <br />created by the provisional data from that report, which <br />summarizes annual water use from the system by States, <br />including water use supplied by ground-water overdraft, The <br />next report, 1986-1990, is expected to be available in 1992, <br /> <br />Upper Basin Uses and Losses <br /> <br />The three largest categories of consumptive use and losses in <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin are agricultural uses within <br />the basin, transbasin diversions to adjacent drainages, and <br />evaporation losses from the major reservoirs of the Colorado <br />River System, During water year 1989, the estimated use for <br />municipal, industrial and agriculture supplies in the Upper <br />Basin was about 3,0 maf, Estimated evaporation losscs were <br />about 720,000 acre-feet from main stem reservoirs. <br />Approximately 680,000 acre-feet was diverted for use in <br />adjacent drainages, Total estimated consumptive use <br />amounted to about 3,9 maL Storage in the Upper Basin <br />mainstem reservoirs decreased by 2,6 maf during water year <br />1989, <br /> <br />Lower Basin Uses and Losses <br /> <br />During water year 1989. an estimated 5,5 maf of water were <br />re\eased from Lake Havasu to meet the requirements for <br />water deliveries at Imperial Dam, as well as those of the <br />Colorado River Indian Reservation near Parker, Arizona, the <br />Palo Verde Irrigation District near Blythe. California, other <br />miscellaneous users along the river, and transit losses between <br />Parker Dam and Imperial Dam, <br /> <br />The major water diversions above Parker Dam were by MWD <br />and the CAP. MWD pumped approximately <br />1,198.000 acre-feet from Lake Havasu during water year 1989 <br /> <br />and approximately 747,000 acre-feet were pumped for the <br />CAP, <br /> <br />Releases of approximately 7,7 maf were made from <br />Lake Mohave during water year 1989, to provide for releases <br />to meet minimum downstream needs in the United States at <br />Parker Dam; to supply diversion requirements of MWD and <br />CAP, miscellaneous contractors, and other users; to offset <br />evaporation and other transit losses between Davis and <br />Parker dams; and to maintain the scheduled levels of <br />Lake Havasu, <br /> <br />During water year 1989, releases of approximately 7.5 maf <br />were made from Lake Mead at Hoover Dam to regulate the <br />levels of Lake Mohave, to provide for the small users from <br />Lake Mohave, and to provide for releases at Davis Dam to <br />meet needs in the United States, In addition, <br />243,000 acre-feet were diverted from Lake Mead for use by <br />the Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Boulder City; <br />Basic Management, Inc.; and contractors of the Colorado <br />River Commission of Nevada, Total releases and diversions <br />from Lake Mead during water year 1989 were an estimated <br />9,270,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />For water year 1990, a total release of 6.5 maf from <br />Lake Havasu is projected, including consumptive use <br />requirements in the United States below Parker Dam, transit <br />losses and regulation in the river between Parker Dam and the <br />Mexican Border, and treaty deliveries to Mexico, <br /> <br />During water year 1990, MWD is expected to divert <br />1,312,000 acre-feet by pumping from Lake Havasu. The CAP <br />is expected to pump approximately 848,000 acre-feet. <br />Consumptive uses by small users, river losses or gains, and <br />reservoir losses between Davis Dam and Parker Dam are <br />projected to be a net loss of 46,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />There are no major users between Hoover Dam and <br />Davis Dam, During water year 1990, diversions from <br />Lake Mead are projected at 1%,000 acre-feet. Evaporation <br />from Lake Mead is projected to be about 900,000 acre-feet <br />and net gain between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead is <br />expected to be about 950,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />23 <br />