Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I",i <br />" <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />(-) <br />Ul <br />00 <br />OJ <br /> <br />Red 'Mountain and Wolcott Reservoirs <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Red.Mountain ~eservoir: <br />Wolcott Reservoir : <br />(wjEagle Diversion only) <br />Total <br /> <br />140,000 l'lf <br />160.000 af <br /> <br />300,OOOaf <br /> <br />A:;>:uJ::e' and Wolcott'Reservoirs <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Azure Reservoir: <br />Wolcott ResEilrvoir: <br />(wjEaqle Diversion only) <br />Total <br /> <br />85,000 af <br />160.000 af <br /> <br />J <br />:;".:;" <br /> <br />245,000 af <br /> <br />...... <br /> <br />Red Mountain and Una Reservoirs <br /> <br />Red Mountain Reservoir: <br />Una Re;servoir: <br />Total <br /> <br />140,000 af <br />19.6.000 af <br />336,000 af <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The capacity and yield relationship are depicted in the Figure 5.2 <br />for the range of yields and capacities analyzed. The upper <br />bounci.ary of the shaded area rEilpresents the relationship under the <br />Existing Level Use Scenario without the pumpbaok system. The lower <br />boundary, represents the relationship under the High Future Level <br />Use Sc,enario with the 154,000 af pumpback system. These two <br />conditions represent extremes of the yields estimated for various <br />co-nditionsanalyzed in this study. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It is.' evident' from' the figure that all six reservoir sites can <br />produce the necessary yield to. meet the Joint-Use Reservoir <br />requirement (approximately 30,000 af). From the standpoint of <br />storage efficienoy {water yield capacity per unit volume of <br />storage}, Una Reservoir become,s . the mOl>t efficient followed by <br />Wolcott Reservoir wit,h Colorado and Eagle Diversions. It should <br />also be noted that for r(l0streservoir sites the yield-storage <br /> <br />5-11 <br />